The X2 also appears to be outfitted with a slightly darker grey shell than the original X. Alongside the X which I borrowed, the X2 looks almost black. It’s hard to say whether that’s just because his X has faded considerably, or whether the X2 has been intentionally made darker so people can tell the two apart. It’s probably a subtle thing similar to the way Apple made logos chrome between the 3G and 3GS to differentiate the two. 

The other obvious way to differentiate which one is which is by looking at the back cover. The X2 has its name in red written below the metallic Motorola logo on the battery door. Otherwise even the two battery doors are identical. The trademark thickness bulge where the camera is located also persists on the X2. This is one area that I think could have benefited from some slimming, although it’s physically impossible to reduce the throw (depth) of some camera systems.

Button placement on the X2 is likewise the same as the X. At the top is power, centered and raised slightly. Just offset from it is the headset jack and then a microphone for noise cancellation on calls. 

On the right side is the volume rocker which is identical to the one on the X. It’s a solid piece of plastic with a small detent in the center. The buttons are still sufficiently clicky. Of course, at the very bottom of the right side is where the two-step camera button would have been, should Motorola have decided it was worth keeping. 

The bottom has a small lip with the same physical, backlit Android buttons. Thankfully these are in the same order as they were on the X, so there’s no relearning if you’re upgrading. Dead center below buttons is the primary microphone for calls, just like before. 

The left side of the X2 is still home to microUSB and a microHDMI port. Back when we reviewed the X, I was disappointed with how HDMI was implemented. You could output certain types of media to the TV, but not do full mirroring. Instead, the display turned into a small control panel, and the attached HDMI monitor became the playback canvas. It felt half-baked back then. 

This time, you can do full mirroring with overscan control. What’s odd, however, is that rotation isn’t implemented like it was on the Optimus 2X.

Plug an HDMI monitor in, and the whole interface rotates to landscape and stays there. If you have an application which only has portrait support, it will appear rotated 90 degrees on the TV, instead of rotating properly like the LG Optimus 2X does.

The phone’s display is upscaled to 1080p using what looks like nearest neighbor, so things are blocky, but it works. 

Proximity sensor and the notification LED are still hidden in the black strips up near the earpiece. Again, it wouldn’t surprise me if all of this was exactly the same as it was on the original X just because of how virtually nothing is physically different on the outside of the X2. I guess that actually sums up what there is to say about the exterior - if you liked the angular and masculine aesthetics of the original X, you’ll like the X2 because it’s essentially the same thing. Similarly, if you disliked the way the X looked, you’ll dislike the X2. 

Intro and Hardware Overview Motoblur by any other name is still motoblur
POST A COMMENT

72 Comments

View All Comments

  • HangFire - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    Far be it from me to defend Apple, but this has little to do with them. The popularity of streaming media- made possible by WiFi, 3G, 4G, and pocketable 720P level resolution screens, has made phones mini media devices, and as for viewing media on screens, the bigger the better.

    I like a small phone, and a large TV screen. The market is in the process of discovering just what compromise people want, and don't want, in terms of size.

    Anyway, the current 3.5" screen iPhone is smaller (and more phone-like) than these 4.3" mini-tablets.
    Reply
  • jonup - Friday, July 08, 2011 - link

    I was not bad talking Apple so no point to defend them. I was inferring to the fact that the iPhone revolutionalized/popularized the "mini media devices". I was just a little facetious but thats my style. ;p
    That said I am left with virtually no upgrade options unless I want to spend $1000+.
    Reply
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    Did you retest the talk time for the original X? Or is your friend's X an early one? I got mine at the beginning of March, and the web browsing tests look similar to what I would expect from my phone (what do you set the screen brightness to?) but I don't think it could get anywhere near 8.9 hrs of calling. I'm used to seeing it drop 10% for 15-20 minutes of calling. Reply
  • jmcb - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    Being in a good or bad reception area will have an effect on battery life. Are you in a bad reception area? Reply
  • Brian Klug - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    I'm definitely aware of how much of a difference that can make, and we always test in moderate to good coverage areas. In this particular test area, VZW signal (both 1x and EVDO) are above -70 dBm, which is pretty good. I believe there's a screenshot or two that show -70 dBm and -65 dBm.

    -Brian
    Reply
  • strikeback03 - Friday, July 08, 2011 - link

    My Elixir icon shows less helpful stuff like "65%", so not sure what kind of reception in dBm I'm seeing. Though on further reading I doubt it would hit the WiFi browsing time either, with the screen on at my standard 12% brightness and all radios off I don't think it would last almost 9 hrs. Reply
  • strafejumper - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    I see the Motorola Droid 3 is up for order now on Verizon!
    Is the Droid 3 the next version of the phone in this review? Or a different animal?

    If its the next in the same line its pretty funny that by the time a good review comes out for the phone the next one is already available to order!

    Maybe with android phones if you wait for a thorough review you will be outdated before you have the phone in hand!

    http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/07/motorola-droid-...
    Reply
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    It is more or less they same phone in a different form factor. Same as the Droid 2 and Droid X were closely related. Reply
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, July 07, 2011 - link

    MY apologies, Droid 3 isn't Tegra 2, it is OMAP 4430. Brain fart. Anyway, it is still more a supplement than a replacement to the Droid X2 Reply
  • LoneWolf15 - Friday, July 08, 2011 - link

    Actually, the Droid 3 replaces the Droid 2, just as the Droid X2 replaces the Droid X.

    For those of us who still like tactile keyboards (like myself), the Droid 3 is the preferable phone.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now