CPU Performance

For the full breakdown of x86 CPU performance head over to Bench and compare away. As I mentioned in our preview of the A8-3850 a couple of weeks ago, general purpose performance isn't that great. Although AMD has tweaked the A8's cores, the 2.9GHz 3850 performs a lot like a 3.1GHz Athlon II X4. You are getting more performance at a lower clock frequency, but not a lot more.

Compared to the Core i3-2100/2105 the A8-3850 really doesn't change the current state of AMD vs. Intel. If you're running lightly threaded apps, the Core i3 just has much better performance. Look at our single-threaded Cinebench scores below and you'll see a 50% performance advantage.

CPU bound gaming performance is also an area where the A8 falls behind the i3. Here you're looking at a 25 - 50% advantage for the i3-2100/2105:

Applications that are a mix of one or more CPU intensive threads still favor the Core i3 as you can see from the Photoshop performance results:

Go to the other end of the spectrum and load the A8-3850 up with CPU intensive threads, and it'll actually hold its own. As strong as the Core i3 is, there's no replacement for more cores when it comes to these thread heavy workloads. I should add that despite the A8's core count advantage, it's biggest victory in these heavily threaded tests is still only 9%:

There's not much more to be said here. The A8-3850 isn't going to set any records for general use performance. If your primary use for your PC is going to be gaming however, Llano has something to offer you...

The Direct Competitor: Intel's Core i3-2105 Llano GPU Performance vs. DDR3 Speed
POST A COMMENT

99 Comments

View All Comments

  • AnandThenMan - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    What happened to them, I thought it was stated that they will be up "in a few hours". And what about some DX11 tests, seeing Llano is capable, why not run a few DX11 games to see what it can do? Reply
  • crocin - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    Would be interesting to see how this A8-3850(150$?) will fair vs an intel pentium G840 + amd 5670(85$+70$=155$). Simply because these are the 2 options one would have when picking up a system with same money yeah?

    Also, wont this system would make so much more sense, if mobo makers came out with a 20$ motherboard w\o pci-e, hell no old school pci slots either. One 4gb ram slot of speeds upto 1866. Hmmm, that will bring AMD into the win for ultra cheap desktops. Or I am just crazy maybe. :p ANyway, always best part about AT is the technical part and the colorful graphs yey,
    Reply
  • triclops41 - Thursday, June 30, 2011 - link

    Slap this in a windows version of a Mac Mini and you have the coolest HTPC/portable 720p gaming system around. Almost as good as a PS3 or 360, tiny, quiet and versatile. Reply
  • JoJoman88 - Friday, July 01, 2011 - link

    To me this just will not due for desktop at all. I can see the positives for notebooks and all but unless there is a greater range to crossfire with this is no use to me. Isn't that the problem with PS3 and 360, you are stuck with the video that the unit comes with at the time of purchase. Yes you could just pop in a better Fusion chip later and keep the rest of the system the same,that is better that what you can do with a PS 3 or 360. I have at least 5 AMD video cards that will smoke this thing.

    I know AMD will improve the Fusion line in the future. but they will never come even with the latest separate CPU and video card. Is Open CL really going to be that big of a deal that you will need the feature. I can't see this APU doing Open CL and gaming at the same time. Would, or do games use Open CL/Direct Compute at the the same time as Direct X. Would they not be using the same GPU at the same time and choke the system down.What about multitasking, you couldn't run a Open CL/Direct Compute at the same times as you were playing a DX game at the same time without killing the GPU Right ?!?

    I just don't see what good except as others have said that this desktop stuff is aimed for OEM's to save money and raise the preformance of their lower end computers. I am open to that i'm totally wrong about how this works.
    Reply
  • bhima - Saturday, July 02, 2011 - link

    The Llano APU in a desktop just makes absolutely no sense as a budget gaming system unless you really only want the APU's graphics. Otherwise, if you are planning to actually buy a cheap discrete GPU you'll already surpass Llano's on-board offering with like a $50 board AND you won't be severely bottlenecked by their piss-poor performing CPU. The mobile Llano's make sense, but the desktop ones are just too damn gimped compared to the i3... the lowest performing Intel processor.

    /yawn wake me up when Bulldozer gets here.
    Reply
  • Aone - Sunday, July 03, 2011 - link

    When you did the price calculation of Llano vs. Athlon you forgot to include MB price.
    Llano MB prices are >100$ today.
    And IMO, Phenom X2+d.GPU is much better option for gaming PC than Athlon X4.
    Reply
  • qqgoodhao - Sunday, July 17, 2011 - link

    http://www.ifancyshop.com

    Women's fashion, men's personality + shoes

    Travel bagthat eye-catching jacket + super pack free shipping
    Reply
  • zgoodbbb - Wednesday, July 20, 2011 - link

    http://www.ifancyshop.com

    Women's fashion, men's personality + shoes

    Travel bagthat eye-catching jacket + super pack free shipping
    Reply
  • Idanisi - Thursday, August 11, 2011 - link

    would crossfire work with a nvidia video card? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now