Earlier this week Intel sent us a cryptic message:

I wanted to invite you to an Intel press conference on Wednesday May 4th at 9:30am Pacific time. Intel will be making its most significant technology announcement of the year. No further details will be provided in advance. The event will be held in San Francisco so for those of you are local in the SF Bay Area please attend in person if you like. It will also webcasted live. Tune-in details and logistics are below. Please let me know if you can attend.

A while ago Intel decided that a nice way to drive up its stock price would be to behave more like Apple, keeping major announcements under wraps and introducing them on its own terms to hopefully build up anticipation and excitement for Intel's announcements. You've seen examples of this with how closely Intel held Sandy Bridge's architectural details before its presentation at IDF, and how little we knew about Quick Sync (Sandy Bridge's hardware video transcoder) until Intel decided it was time to talk about it.

Apple can get away with it since most of its products are tangible, consumer facing devices. Intel's technologies are arguably even more important, but they're just not as easy for the general populace to get excited about. Today's announcement is the perfect example of just that.

Earlier today Intel announced that its 22nm process would not use conventional planar transistors but rather be the first time Intel is using 3D Tri-Gate transistors. This is a huge announcement that fuels Intel's leadership in the mobile/desktop/server CPU space and makes it a lot more attractive in the SoC space, let's understand why.

The Transistor

Here's a simple diagram of a standard 32nm planar transistor, exactly what you'd find in a Sandy Bridge CPU:


I
mage Courtesy Intel Corporation

I spent a couple of semesters as a computer engineering student a few years ago studying how these things work. There's a lot of math and it's not fun to do over and over again so we'll ignore all of that for now. The basics are thankfully much more fun to understand.

 


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

The goal of a transistor is to act as a very high speed electrical switch. When on, current flows from the transistor's source to the drain. When off, current stops. The inversion layer (blue line above) is where the current flow actually happens.

Ideally a transistor needs to do three things:

1) Allow as much current to flow when it's on (active current)
2) Allow as little current to flow when it's off (leakage current)
3) Switch between on and off states as quickly as possible (performance)

The first item impacts how much power your CPU uses when it's actively doing work, the second impacts how much power it draws when idle and the third influences clock speed.

In conventional planar transistors it turns out that voltage in the silicon substrate impacts leakage current in a negative way. Fully depleted SOI (silicon on insulator) is an option to combating this effect.

The smaller you make the transistors, the more difficult it is to make advancements in all three of these areas all while increasing transistor density. After all not only do you have to worry about keeping power under control, but the whole point to shrinking transistor dimensions is to cram more of them into the same physical die area, thus paving the way for better performance (more cores, larger caches, higher performance structures, more integration).

The 3D Tri-Gate Transistor

A 3D Tri-Gate transistor looks a lot like the planar transistor but with one fundamental change. Instead of having a planar inversion layer (where electrical current actually flows), Intel's 3D Tri-Gate transistor creates a three-sided silicon fin that the gate wraps around, creating an inversion layer with a much larger surface area.

 


I
mage Courtesy Intel Corporation

There are five outcomes of this move:

1) The gate now exerts far more control over the flow of current through the transistor.
2) Silicon substrate voltage no longer impacts current when the transistor is off.
3) Thanks to larger inversion layer area, more current can flow when the transistor is on.
4) Transistor density isn't negatively impacted.
5) You can vary the number of fins to increase drive strength and performance.

The first two points in the list result in lower leakage current. When Intel's 22nm 3D Tri-Gate transistors are off, they'll burn less power than a hypothetical planar 22nm process.

 


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

The third point is particularly exciting because it allows for better transistor performance as well as lower overall power. The benefits are staggering:


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

At the same switching speed, Intel's 22nm 3D Tri-Gate transistors can run at 75 - 80% of the operating voltage of Intel's 32nm transistors. This results in lower active power at the same frequency, or the same active power at a higher performance level. Intel claims that the reduction in active power can be more than 50% compared to its 32nm process.


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

At lower voltages Intel is claiming a 37% increase in performance vs. its 32nm process and an 18% increase in performance at 1V. High end desktop and mobile parts fall into the latter category. Ivy Bridge is likely to see gains on the order of 18% vs. Sandy Bridge, however Intel may put those gains to use by reducing overall power consumption of the chip as well as pushing for higher frequencies. The other end of that curve is really for the ultra mobile chips, this should mean big news for the 22nm Atom which I'm guessing we'll see around 2013.


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

You'll note that the move to 3D Tri-Gate transistors doesn't negatively impact transistor density. In fact Intel is claiming a 2x density improvement from 32nm to 22nm (you can fit roughly twice as many transistors in the same die area at 22nm as you could on Intel's 32nm process).

 


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

It's also possible to vary the number of fins to impact drive strength and performance, allowing Intel to more finely tune/target its 22nm process to various products.

The impact on manufacturing cost is also minimal. Compared to a hypothetical Intel 22nm planar process, the 3D Tri-Gate process should only cost another 2 - 3%


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation

All 22nm products from Intel will use its 3D Tri-Gate transistors.

What Does This Mean

Intel's Ivy Bridge is currently scheduled for a debut in the first half of 2012. Intel is purposefully being vague about the release quarter as Sandy Bridge is doing well and isn't facing much competition at the high end at least.

The impact of Intel's 22nm 3D Tri-Gate transistors on high end x86 CPUs will be significant. Intel isn't expecting its competitors to move to a similar technology until 14nm. The increases in switching speed at the same voltage could allow Intel to finally hit or exceed that magical 4GHz barrier in a stock CPU. I suspect Intel will likely use the gains to deliver lower power CPUs however there's always the possibility of some very fast Extreme Edition parts.


Image Courtesy Intel Corporation.

The bigger story here actually has to do with Atom. The biggest gains Intel is showing are at very low voltages, exactly what will benefit ultra mobile SoCs. Atom has had a tough time getting into smartphones and while we may see limited success at 32nm, the real future is what happens at 22nm. Atom is due for a new microprocessor architecture in 2012, if Intel goes the risky route and combines it with its 22nm process it could have a knockout on its hands.

POST A COMMENT

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • blanarahul - Wednesday, March 28, 2012 - link

    http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/cpu/intel/22nm...

    Did someone notice a gray curved line in this image between the black and blue ones?

    Could it be representing 22 nm planar transistor? Because if it does the entire idea of moving to 3d transistors was useless for desktop CPUs because they operate at greater than 1.3 volts.
    Reply
  • blanarahul - Wednesday, March 28, 2012 - link

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1329758/power2.jpg
    This is an image i made after modifying the original image by Intel!
    Reply
  • siromega9 - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    One of the interesting things from one of the promo/detail videos Intel also put out this morning is that this is like a two node jump. So instead of just going from 32nm to 22nm, the actual performance they'll get out of the chip is like jumping from 32nm to 14nm. In historical terms, like jumping from a 2006 65nm Conroe Core 2 CPU to a 2011 32nm Sandy Bridge CPU.

    I don't think this will help them in the ARM battle. The difficulty is that while a 22nm Atom might be suitable for tablets, its still probably not integrated enough for smartphones. And from an architecture standpoint, thats one ecosystem (Android and iPhone promise that phone apps will run on the tablet). So an x86 tablet would need to have enough horsepower to emulate a multicore ARM chip plus the GPUs on the ARM chip. Given the possibility of 28nm quad core ARM chips with incredible GPUs, I don't see the Atom being able to emulate that successfully.
    Reply
  • megakilo - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    Why emulation? Android runs fine on x86. The apps are in Java except the NDK part needs to be recompiled even though the system optimization is very important to achieve best performance. Reply
  • siromega9 - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    Correct, so not Android but iOS apps (which are compiled to ARM code) would need an emulator. Reply
  • nonzenze - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    Because ObjectiveC cannot be trivially compiled to x86? The APIs hide all the platform specific junk anyway.

    Heck, Apple already has all the source code from the original AppStore submission process, they could quite easily recompile the whole store without any further intervention from developers.
    Reply
  • Thinkyhead - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    As an App Store developer I can assure you, Apple doesn't have any of my source code, and they would require developers to personally rebuild their apps as ARM / x86 universal binaries for new hardware. The iOS virtualizer that comes with XCode actually runs an x86 version of your app, so Apple could quickly handle the switch. Reply
  • tristangrimaux - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    Nope. Not emulation needed for iOS either Reply
  • Smooth2o - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 - link

    Intel Arom is not going to emulate anything. It will run Android apps directly. All apps are at high level coding and can easily be moved to a different architecture. Reply
  • nimsaw - Thursday, May 05, 2011 - link

    I am unable to follow the concept of 'node jump'. Could you please clarify it. Is it just a jump from older manufacturing processes or is there more to it? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now