Application Performance: the i7-640M vs. the i7-720QM

The Clevo B5130M has brought with it an interesting point of contention that AVADirect was graceful enough to let us test: can Intel's fastest mobile dual-core, the i7-640M, outperform their slowest current-generation mobile quad, the i7-720QM? It's something worth exploring, because the 640M can actually be found for a reasonable price online for users daring enough to upgrade their mobile processors. The two are essentially at near price parity, but while the 720QM can turbo up from its nominal 1.6GHz clock to 2.4GHz on two cores and 2.8GHz on one core, the 640M starts at 2.8GHz and hits 3.2GHz on two cores and a blistering 3.46GHz on a single core. Both of these chips are Hyper-Threaded, too.

Ouch. That's actually pretty damning for the i7-720QM. It's only in the most heavily threaded tasks that the quad-core can produce a lead over the i7-640M, and even then the lead isn't exactly commanding. Unless you're certain you can take advantage of the 720QM's four physical and eight logical cores, the 640M may wind up being a better choice more often than not.

As a special bonus round, we took a quick look at hard drive performance to see how the Western Digital Scorpio Black fares against the industry standard Seagate Momentus 7200.4. The Momentus is extremely common and is usually the drive found in notebooks shipping with a 7200RPM hard disk. In testing with HDTune Pro 4.60, we found the performance of the two to be fairly close, with the Scorpio Black producing negligibly faster scores across the board. The exception is burst speed: the Scorpio had a measured 138.7 MB/sec burst speed, nearly 40MB/sec faster than the Seagate. Measured latency was also 1.5ms lower on the Scorpio Black, but at the end of the day we're not sure the drive is ultimately worth the upgrade. Mercifully, it's only four bucks more than the Seagate when configuring from AVADirect, so if you're not keen on going the SSD route and even the Momentus XT is too rich for your blood, the Scorpio Black is a solid alternative.

You Know It's a Clevo Gaming and Graphics Performance: Futuremark and Low Preset
Comments Locked

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dug - Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - link

    Isn't it true that you don't get the benefit of battery life from an i7 because Nvidia isn't able to switch to the built in graphics? So the whole benefit of optimus is thrown out the door.

    If so, I would think an i5 would be a better match for this laptop.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - link

    That's on i7 quad-core processors. Anything Arrandale-based with an IGP, Optimus can work. i7-640 is just a higher clocked version of i5-520/540/560/580, and those in turn are higher clocked (and higher Turbo) versions of the OEM-only i5-430/450/460.
  • stancilmor - Thursday, November 25, 2010 - link

    aside from a using a dell ultra-sharp quality LCD/LED panel why can't manufacturers just do away with the track-pad, push the keyboard forward,and include a wireless logitech mouse.
  • Hrel - Thursday, December 2, 2010 - link

    ASUS N53JF-XE1

    I think that's a pretty amazing offer for 1K.

    1080p screen, BD drive, USB 3.0, DX11 graphics that will run any game at 1280x720 just fine. Includes an excellent Asus warranty for a year, accidental damage and all.
  • Hrel - Friday, December 3, 2010 - link

    You guys should try to get your hands on one of these Asus N series models.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    I think it offers a pretty amazing Bang to Buck ratio.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now