Four years ago AMD did the unthinkable: it announced the 5.4 billion dollar acquisition of ATI in a combination of cash and stock. What followed was a handful of very difficult years for AMD, an upward swing for ATI and the eventual spinoff of AMD’s manufacturing facilities to GlobalFoundries in order to remain profitable and competitive.

In the years post acquisition, many criticized AMD for blowing a lot of money on ATI and having little to show for it. Even I felt that for $5.4 billion AMD could’ve put together its own competent graphics and chipset teams.

Despite the protest and sideline evaluations, good has come from the acquisition. The most noticeable is the fact that AMD’s chipset business is the strongest it has ever been. AMD branded chipsets and integrated graphics are actually very good. And later this year, AMD will ship its first Fusion APUs (single die CPU/GPU): Ontario using Bobcat cores and an AMD GPU. Ontario will be the first tangible example of direct AMD/ATI collaboration since the acquisition.

Just as we’re about to see results from the acquisition AMD is announcing that it will retire the ATI brand later this year. Save those boxes guys, soon you won’t see an ATI logo on any product sold in the market.

The motivation behind the decision to retire the ATI brand comes from AMD’s own internal research. Unfortunately AMD isn’t sharing the details of this research, just the three major findings from it:

1) AMD brand preference triples when the person surveyed is aware of the ATI-AMD merger.
2) The AMD brand is viewed as stronger than ATI when compared to graphics competitors (presumably NVIDIA).
3) The Radeon and Fire Pro brands themselves (without ATI being attached to them) are very high as is.

The second point is really the justification for all of this. If AMD’s internal research is to be believed, AMD vs. NVIDIA is better from a marketing standpoint than ATI vs. NVIDIA. Honestly, AMD’s research seems believable. AMD has always seemed like a stronger brand to me than ATI. There’s little room for ego in business (despite it being flexed all too often) and I don’t believe AMD would hurt its marketing simply to satisfy any AMD executives - the research makes sense.

Meanwhile the third point is the realization that there are very few product lines with the ATI brand left. ATI's chipset operations were quickly absorbed in to AMD and given appropriate naming, while ATI's consumer electronics products such as their Digital TV division have been sold to other companies. Radeon and FirePro are the only two ATI product lines left, and both are strong brands on their own.

The brand switch also reflects some internal changes at AMD. Many important ATI employees have been relocated to AMD's base of operations in Austin, Texas in order to help with Liano, Ontario, and AMD's future Fusion products. So the line between AMD and ATI has been further blurring for some time.

The brand switch will start late this year, I’d guess in Q4 with Ontario and a new GPU release. AMD (and NVIDIA) originally had GPU designs for the 32nm process node however extensive teething problems with 40nm and 32nm forced TSMC to cancel the node and move directly to 28nm. This cancellation required both companies to redesign their parts to work within existing 40nm processes and move their original plans out to coincide with 28nm in 2011. As a result we will see an incremental update to the Radeon HD 5000 series at the end of this year, but don’t expect the sort of performance boost we got with the 5800 vs. 4800. This upcoming hardware will probably carry the AMD Radeon HD 6000 series brand. All existing hardware will continue to carry the ATI brand.

To go along with the new brand we get new logos. If OEMs want to display a badge without the AMD brand, there’s an alternative for that as well:

AMD states the AMD-less logos are purely at the request of OEMs who sell systems with Intel CPUs and AMD GPUs. I suspect Intel’s logo program may have some stipulations on being used adjacent to a sticker with an AMD logo on it, although AMD told me it was purely at the request of the OEMs trying to avoid confusion.

The other major change is AMD’s brand simplification at the retail level. Last year AMD introduced a new platform brand called Vision. If you buy a PC with all AMD components (CPU, chipset and GPU) it can carry a Vision logo (similar to Intel’s Centrino brand). There are four categories of Vision support all with increasing hardware requirements: Vision, Vision Premium, Vision Ultimate and Vision Black. The idea is that if you buy a standard Vision PC you’ll have a good entry level machine, but buying up the stack grants you additional capabilities and performance (e.g. Blu-ray playback, web cam support, discrete GPUs, multicore CPUs etc...). We’ve explained it all in greater detail here.

Starting next year, AMD’s Vision badge will be the only CPU brand you see on retail desktops/notebooks. You’ll still get Radeon/Fire Pro badges on systems that use those parts, but you’ll no longer see a Phenom II, Athlon II, Turion or Sempron logo on Vision systems. Instead you’ll see what CPU is inside on the little card that sits next to the system at your local retailer.

I suspect this will last until AMD introduces Bulldozer, at which point it’ll probably be very eager to build up its brand - assuming performance its is competitive.

Final Words

Retiring the ATI brand comes at an interesting time in the microprocessor market. Graphics is becoming much more important, but to date we have very few examples outside of 3D games as good consumer applications for powerful GPUs. AMD views this as the perfect time to consolidate its brands before the CPU/GPU line gets more blurry.

AMD also pointed out that its market share has been on a steady climb over the past few years. According to Mercury Research, AMD’s discrete GPUs climbed from ~33% marketshare at the end of 2007 to 51% last quarter. AMD has executed unusually well on the GPU side and NVIDIA has had some very difficult years in the process, both of which are responsible for AMD’s climb. The ATI name will go out on a high note.


AMD Discrete GPU Marketshare, Source: Mercury Research

If all goes well with AMD’s two exciting new CPU architectures next year, the brand will only get stronger going forward. Bobcat could do very well in today’s netbook/thin and light notebook form factors and Bulldozer may mark a return to competition in the server and high end desktop markets.

POST A COMMENT

80 Comments

View All Comments

  • vol7ron - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    While not as significant, I think this is still kind of true for the laptop market. Reply
  • vol7ron - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    I had other cards before, but it seems like it wasn't that long ago that I took a chance on ATIs All-In-Wonder 9600XT, possibly my favorite of the ATI brand.

    It was my first DVR; plus it had a higher clock and more mem than the standard 9600XT, which made it a gaming contender. In a way I miss the old AGP.

    I don't think this improves AMDs brand recognition, much like the merger of AT&T and Cingular caused more confusion than gain, but this could be an effort to suppress negative reviews and start fresh.
    Reply
  • Dennis Travis - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    Also very sad to see ATI go away after all these years. I have used ATI as long as I can remember from some old PCI cards to the early Radeon to the All In Wonder series. Remember 3Dfx and all the other brands mentioned also, but ATI has always been a favorite of mine. Reply
  • scottwilkins - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    At lead AMD will continue to innovate ATI products and bring new ones with the same great technology to market. Unlike nVidia who basically bought 3dFX just to bury them and keep others in the market from getting good technology. 3dFX truly died, and was laid to rest. ATI will continue to live on and on. Hooray for that!!! Reply
  • LauRoman - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    What i really will miss most from that logo si both the RADEON and ATi fonts. If they couldsomehow integrate at least the Ati font it would really be awsome. Sadly they won't be doing that because their biggest competitor phased their chipset(ish) logo and their processor logo and used a unifide logo. Reply
  • CloudFire - Sunday, August 29, 2010 - link

    I'll still be calling my graphics cards ATi, I've loved this brand for way too long to be calling it AMD. At least they are keeping the red colored logo for recognition. :) Reply
  • AssBall - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    Me too. It will take a few years before I can start wrapping my head and tongue around calling them Radeon or AMD cards in normal conversation. Reply
  • ssj4Gogeta - Sunday, August 29, 2010 - link

    AMD vs. Nvidia may seem stronger, but the ATI logo is certainly more familiar. Reply
  • Murloc - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    I'm not so sure about that.
    For enthusiast, yes, of course.
    But the average consumer reads radeon more often than ATI, and if you ask him he can't remember.
    I think the move makes sense.
    Reply
  • punjabiplaya - Monday, August 30, 2010 - link

    RIP ATI, we will miss you. At least the core - Ontario gives them some recognition, lol. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now