The Test & Performance

As the Vortex has a slight factory overclock compared to a stock-clocked 5770, we’ve run our usual gauntlet of benchmarks. We’ll forgo the running commentary, but with a 5% core overclock and 2% memory overclock, the card performs a few percent better than the stock-clocked 5770 on average.

CPU: Intel Core i7-920 @ 3.33GHz
Motherboard: Asus Rampage II Extreme
Chipset Drivers: Intel 9.1.1.1015 (Intel)
Hard Disk: OCZ Summit (120GB)
Memory: Patriot Viper DDR3-1333 3 x 2GB (7-7-7-20)
Video Cards: AMD Radeon HD 5970
AMD Radeon HD 5870
AMD Radeon HD 5850
AMD Radeon HD 5830
AMD Radeon HD 5770
AMD Radeon HD 5750
AMD Radeon HD 4890
AMD Radeon HD 4870 1GB
AMD Radeon HD 4850
AMD Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
PowerColor Radeon HD 5770 PCS+ Vortex Edition
Video Drivers: NVIDIA ForceWare 197.13
NVIDIA ForceWare 257.15 Beta
NVIDIA ForceWare 258.80 Beta
AMD Catalyst 10.3a
AMD Catalyst 10.7
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Index Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, August 26, 2010 - link

    Data for lower-end cards will be coming next month. We have to build a new benchmark suite for those cards, and it takes (a lot of) time to gather that data.
  • Phynaz - Thursday, August 26, 2010 - link

    Charts are way two crowded. You're comparing two 5770's, we don't need results from SLI GTX480's.
  • LoneWolf15 - Thursday, August 26, 2010 - link

    PCB of the card is definitely not reference-design, and looks "cheaped down". Only one crossfire connector. Also, note that the reference design 5770 had three-phase power. A number of aftermarket cards cut down to two phases to save $$$.

    Since there are few, if any 5770 reference-design cards left on the market (might be a few from Diamond, but most manufacturers have switched), I normally look at ASUS, one of the few vendors that actually designed their reference cards to be equal or better, rather than to save costs. Other vendors like XFX, Sapphire, and (apparently) PowerColor seem to be going the other way.
  • LoneWolf15 - Thursday, August 26, 2010 - link

    After checking, it seems even ASUS may have cut down their 5770 card. The only two left I'd be interested in are MSI's HAWK 5770, and Diamond's 5770PE51G, which (if you can find one) should be a reference design.

    The downside to Diamond is that customer support is a real crap-shoot. I guess that would leave me looking for a used reference-design 5770 on Ebay; they're still the best version of the card.
  • shin0bi272 - Thursday, August 26, 2010 - link

    Come to think of it if the coolers we have now had something like heat pipes in them instead of fins we could still be getting away with single slot coolers. A gang of oil filled tubes with radial fins extending from the gpu to the ends of the card and one or two going over the ram bank (maybe in a loop) with a 12 bladed 92x5mm fan (or maybe 2 if you wanted to cover the entire card) could offer enough cooling in a cost effective design for the card makers to offer them stock instead of everyone having to buy aftermarket coolers. Granted an aftermarket cooler isnt hard to put on but it does void your warranty which sucks if the card dies.
  • LoneWolf15 - Friday, August 27, 2010 - link

    It doesn't void the warranty for every company.

    XFX (and possibly some others) know that a user might want to water cool their card, so the warranty isn't void for removing the cooler, as long as you don't screw the card up in the process. In my case, I removed the cooler from my reference 5870-XXX Edition almost immediately, to replace the TIM. I found the factory had really glopped it on, so I re-applied it more conservatively, which improved GPU temperatures slightly.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now