Battery Life: Unimpressive

The iPhone doesn't have a very long lasting battery. Before my iPhone I was a Blackberry user; my battery lasted for days. With the iPhone, especially while I'm traveling, I have to keep charging it throughout the day or risk a completely dead phone by 6PM. The Nexus One is worse.

To test battery life I ran the same suite of battery life tests I have been using in our smartphone reviews for the past couple of years:

The wireless web browsing test uses the 3G or WiFi connection to browse a series of 20 web pages varying in size, spending 20 seconds on each page (I timed how long it takes me to read a page on Digg and came up with 36 seconds; I standardized on 20 seconds for the test to make things a little more stressful). The test continues to loop until the phone dies. This test is designed to simulate a relatively heavy, but realistic data load on the phone. We're stressing the modem/WiFi radio, SoC, memory and display subsystems here. This should also be the sort of battery life you get when you are using any apps that use data (but not 3D acceleration). The display brightness was set to roughly 30% on the Nexus One and 50% on the iPhone.

The H.264 movie playback test loops a 480 x 208 632Kbps re-encode of Slumdog Millionaire until the phone dies. The majority of the device is idle during this test stressing the memory subsystem, video decoder, audio decoder and display more than anything else. The display brightness was set to roughly 30% on the Nexus One and 50% on the iPhone.

The talk time test measures battery life over the course of a conversation between the phone being tested and another phone. The conversation is actually an MP3 playlist on repeat played into the microphone of the phone being tested. The display was disabled.

Battery Life
 
Apple iPhone 3G
Apple iPhone 3GS
Google Nexus One
Wireless Web Browsing (3G) 4.50 hours 4.82 hours 3.77 hours
Wireless Web Browsing (WiFi) 6.67 hours 8.83 hours 5.62 hours
H.264 Movie Playback 4.70 hours 9.65 hours 6.67 hours
3G Talk Time 4.82 hours 4.82 hours 4.67 hours

 

Despite having a larger 1400 mAh battery, the Nexus one proved to have worse battery life across the board than the iPhone 3GS both in my tests and in my day to day usage. The only redeeming quality here is that you can easily swap out spare batteries, while the iPhone requires a 3rd party external battery if you need more juice on the go.

Talk time is lower than on the iPhone 3GS. Using the 3G data or WiFi connections both result in the phone dying faster than the 3GS. Even H.264 video playback discharges the Nexus One's battery faster.

I'm not sure if it's the AMOLED display, the Snapdragon SoC or just inefficiencies in Android but the battery life story isn't a good one.

Android does have a power consumption page that shows what percentage of battery drain can be attributed to various components in the phone (e.g. display, OS, specific apps, idle time). It’s not granular enough for my needs but it’s a great way of showing users, at a high level, what’s killing the battery.

Barcodes & Goggles - Making Science Fiction Reality Final Words
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • bjacobson - Monday, April 5, 2010 - link

    Motorola Droid is no better, my friend has one and OC'd his processor to 1.1Ghz and it still lags just as badly. Both choppy and lags where my finger is. I don't like it at all. This is the main reason I haven't even considered the Android platform yet. I probably will when they fix this.
  • LongTimePCUser - Wednesday, April 14, 2010 - link

    Have you tried the Moto Droid after the Android 2.1 upgrade?
    My experience was that the ui seemed smoother and faster after the upgrade.
  • eva2000 - Monday, April 5, 2010 - link

    bummer about battery life, sounds like nexus rev2 with 1700-1800mah battery in the near future heh
  • hugov - Tuesday, April 6, 2010 - link

    I'm not sure the Adreno 200 is as far behind the SGX530/535 as you suggest. The iPhone 3Gs chip (Samsung S5PC100) states in the docs (http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconduct... that the GPU is capable of up to 10M triangles/sec, a far cry from the 28M reported in popular press recently. QSD8250 docs suggest up to 22M triangles. And the Adreno is a unified shader architecture GPU with no fixed-function pipes, similar to the PowerVR SGX. OTOH, the *drivers* appear to be quite lacking compared to the PowerVR drivers, at least on Linux/Android.
  • TheHolyLancer - Tuesday, April 6, 2010 - link

    I mean wow that dog seems to be focused directly on something above the camera, is that a treat or something?
  • ThePooBurner - Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - link

    I really enjoyed reading through this review. I have been wanting to move to a smart phone, but haven't been able to decide what i want. This helps put android devices into perspective in terms of what they can do and what i can expect. I happen to abhor apple, and so i will never own an iphone. I can't stand closed platforms or someone else telling me what i can and can't do with a device that i own. Their stance on "jail-breaking" sickens me. It's like telling me i can't put a new engine in my car if i want to. But that is besides the point. Windows P7 looks like it might be good, but that is a ways off. The Pre-pro looks the most appealing of the phones i have seen reviewed.

    However, there are 2 devices that i would love to see added to the list of reviewed smart phones: The Nokia n900, and the Samsung Omnia II. For the n900, I would love for you to do a review of it and show us what the Maemo platform can do, as well as a quantifiable battery life test. The phone can do just about everything, but knowing how much doing all of that affects the battery life would be great. The device from a hardware standpoint isn't that different from some of the other smart phones out. It's an Cortex A8 at 600mhz. It's got 32GB of storage (expandable to 48), 5mp camera with flash, WiFi, BT, and it also has an FM transmitter. So on paper it looks great, but there haven't really been any solid reviews on the device from good review sites that use quantifiable testing, or from non-marketing type sites. I know that it also has integration with google voice and google chat. The Omnia 2 has an 800Mhz CPU, and a lot of the same hardware features and uses the TouchWiz 2.0 WM6.5 GUI, which appears to be samsung's platform of choice going forward. It's fairly new so there isn't a whole lot of information out there on this phone yet, but it seems to be marketed as the flagship product from samsung at the moment.

    Do you think that you could review these for us? From what i have seen they both look pretty good (though the N900 looks better), but 600$ is a lot to spend without having more than marketing to go off of.

    If nothing else this article has at least brought me up to speed on android and it's benefits.
  • pepsi_max2k - Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - link

    "For example, typing yjomh instead of thong won’t autocorrect, although on the iPhone it will. "

    And I think I speak for everyone, Anand, when I say: Under what situation did you actually find this highly intriguing piece of information out?
  • SuperFly03 - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    Ugh, this review is full of misinformation. I had to say something.

    http://forum.xcpus.com/blogs/superfly03-341.htm
  • coolVariable - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    1. No mention of the lacking exchange sync.
    2. No mention of the lacking copy & paste within emails
    3. No mention of the connectivity issues.
    4. No mention of attachment issues (sending or saving).
    5. No mention of file download issues.
    ...

    What a BAD review.
  • SuperFly03 - Friday, April 9, 2010 - link

    I'm not sure what Google phone you are using but the only problem I've had is no. 2. You can't copy paste within emails. I do believe that is a silly limitation but I do not think it is a big problem in the grand scheme of things.

    No. 1 is complete BS. I have been hooked into my exchange account since day 1 and have never had any issues.

    No. 3 is about as generic as you can get. I realize it is a problem that is on the Google sub-forums but likely a firmware issue not an Android issue.

    No. 4 and 5 is just laughable.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now