Having to print a retraction or deliver information that is totally opposite of what we presented in an article is something we dread, in fact, it is probably the worst single event a reviewer can imagine. Unfortunately, we have to do that today as our coverage on the 785G chipset contains information that appears to be incorrect now after several conversations with AMD this morning.

Let’s just rip the Band-Aid off quickly here. We have touted, as have many others, that the 785G chipset provides multi-channel LPCM audio output. We went over it in our press briefings from AMD and in previous conversations with them and others. It turns out that in retail boards and with the current 9.8 (8.634a) driver set that an audio block exists which limits LPCM output to two-channels. In other words, the 785G is no different from the 780G/790GX chipsets in this regard.

As of now, our initial preview coverage and review is incorrect regarding this feature set. For most users, this will not matter, as two-channel LPCM is available along with 5.1 S/PDIF audio outputs through the HDMI port. However, for the serious HTPC crowd, the lack of multi-channel LPCM is a huge drawback when selecting a platform that will be the centerpiece of your media center. The Intel G41/G43/G45 and NVIDIA GF8200/9300 series of chipsets fully support multi-channel LPCM output as does AMD’s own HD 4xxx series of video cards.

How did this mistake happen? It is a long story we are still unraveling, but I will provide what we know at this point. One of the first items I checked in testing our early pre-production 785G boards/drivers was multi-channel LPCM output. This feature worked based on the application setup, BIOS release, and driver setup we had at the time. In fact, as part of our testing we captured a couple of screenshots and took a quick photo of our A/V receiver indicating PCM direct output on eight channels.

AMD believes at this point that it was an error on the audio output stream or we were actually receiving S/PDIF audio output but the actual signal (flag) was misinterpreted by our hardware/software setup. Another theory is that we received multi-channel output through the Realtek ALC 889a audio codec on the Gigabyte board, however we did not load the Realtek drivers but it is something we are currently testing.

I firmly believe we actually had multi-channel audio output working correctly, but I have been wrong before and certainly will be wrong again at some point. AMD has informed us that the same two-channel audio block utilized on the 780G/790GX has always been present on the 785G chipset except for their Maui products. We are continuing to work with AMD in regards to our test discrepancies, but for now LPCM output is limited to two-channel operation.

We confirmed it on several different boards today after AMD notified us this morning that we should check this capability again. Unfortunately, after the last driver and BIOS updates on Friday afternoon, I did not complete driver regression testing on the audio side of the chipset over the weekend. A huge mistake as it turns out and one that I sincerely regret and apologize for now.

I had several valid reasons but in the end I cut corners in order to finish the chipset review for today. In hindsight, I should have postponed the article until all of the regression testing was completed. Audio output was one item left off the list; the thinking was if it worked before, it surely would work again. Plus the A/V receiver was generating the desired Direct PCM output flag, but a closer look would have revealed the loss of channels as it turns out. So, the A/V receiver is now out of the cabinet and next to the monitor station.

In case you are wondering about what else was left off the list, I did not verify if core unlocking was still working (it does) or general overclocking attributes of the chipset (no changes). I figured those items would be covered in testing this week for the motherboard article next week, as they tend to be board/BIOS/CPU specific.

This brings another problem that we have in general with rushed releases. Originally, this chipset was going to be released at the end of August and of course, for a variety of reasons, it was pulled up to 8/4 a couple of weeks ago. That still leaves enough time to properly test the chipset, but typical of recent product launches, the drivers were not solid enough for serious testing until last Wednesday and did not fully mature until Friday afternoon.

This also occurred with the BIOS releases. In fact, we stuck to our guns that we would only utilize retail BIOS releases for testing. The three sample boards that AMD shipped for review all contain excellent BIOS’, but they were hand tuned at AMD. Only ASUS has committed that the BIOS release on their review sample boards will be available to the public. The BIOS releases we utilized on the two Gigabyte 785G boards are what shipped on the boards that we purchased from Newegg when they first went on sale.

I say all of this as the late release required the retesting of five AMD boards with 57 different benchmarks, amounting to around 1040 test runs and the additional time required for reviewing all of the video features in depth, several of which were not working right until last week. We had three days to accomplish this task. No excuses for what happened on my part, but at times something has to give in order to meet a major deadline. My calculation on what to skip in this particular instance turned out to be incorrect. All I can say is that it will not occur again.

That said, our conclusion about the 785G chipset remains true, but for now, we cannot recommend it to the serious HTPC owner looking for an all in one solution. Our recommendation for this audience continues to be the GF9300/9400 motherboards paired with an E6300 or E7200 processor.


Gallery: AMD 785G LPCM
Comments Locked

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • lifeblood - Wednesday, August 5, 2009 - link

    If this is simply a case of "multi-channel LPCM is on some boards but not others" then no problem, that is clearly stated on AMD's website.

    If this is a case of "it's a standard feature but we just haven't had time to perfect it yet in the drivers" then it's annoying but not unprecedented. It's a new chipset and these things do happen.

    If this is a case of "it doesn't work in this spin of silicon so were keeping our mouths shut until the next spin is ready" then AMD is being disingenuous and deserves our scorn.

    If this is a case of AMD intentionally being deceptive on it's website and letting false information and expectations spread, then AMD needs to go bankrupt.
  • jmurbank - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    ''There's more to this story than just "it doesn't work." I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if at some point down the road, AMD magically enables 7.1 over HDMI. This wreaks of a faulty driver issue or a bad spin of silicon. At some point this will get fixed, but until then, my plans to buy one of these motherboards for a HTPC are on hold.''

    It relates to number four in the foot note which states "Not all features will be supported on all machines. Check with your PC manufacturer for specific model capabilities and supported technologies."

    Probably AMD is stating 8 channel LPCM as an option to let motherboard manufactures and PC makers decide to include it which will be in software. Eight channel LPCM might be supported in 785G, but they do not want to say for every board or else DMCA could bring AMD to court and more resources is taken out for new chipset models. The 780G chipset is an open chipset for digital audio because how it passes audio through HDMI.

    I have used a 780G chipset with Linux and I experience that a SXRD projection TV does not always output audio that is coming from HDMI. I do not think the 785G is not any different, but it includes eight channel output only if it complies to standards which means encryption have to be done in software.

    My HTPC is on hold but not because of this problem. It is because of money. I am also waiting for more motherboards that includes sideport memory and DDR3 in a ATX motherboard with 785G.
  • wiak - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    DCMA has nothing to do with multi-channel lpcm
    i think its a software problem aka PowerDVD, Driver or BIOS problem

    @anandtech have you guys tried TotalMedia Theatre 3?
    http://www.arcsoft.com/public/software_title.asp?P...">http://www.arcsoft.com/public/software_...ductID=3...

    so if 785G was gonna be released late auguest, you can say its to early for it to support LPCM acording to bios, drivers,software updates ;)
  • Gary Key - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - link

    Hi,
    Yes, I use TMT3 in testing, at times I prefer it to PDVD 9. We still have the same problem with a 2-channel lock on LPCM. At this point we are getting conflicting reports from AMD about what was/should be/is working on this chipset. The left hand has not met the right hand as of a couple of hours ago. ;)
  • jmurbank - Wednesday, August 5, 2009 - link

    In order for eight channel LPCM to work, encryption have to be used. It is OK to use two channel LPCM without encryption. If it is not OK to use unencrypted eight channel LPCM because it is not in compliance.

    Go back to the Anandtech's article that explains about the requirements of eight channel LPCM.

    It seems AMD is providing the responsibilities on the software developers to make sure the data being transfer over HDMI is in compliance.

    With out encryption, DCMA is involved because a "black box" can be used in between a consumer player and monitor to extract the data to computer. This digital copy is illegal to do. It brings in DCMA and copyright agencies to cover this issue.

    Your software that you suggested may not be in compliance to handle eight channel LPCM. It is most likely they are hoping for the sound card manufacture to do this for them.
  • xfile - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    Thank you for the prompt clarification. This is why I read AT everyday. I was going to grab one of these mobo's, and probably still will, but won't receive a nasty surprise upon installation.
  • GeorgeH - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    Given this news, what's the point of 785G?

    It's process and essentially feature identical to 780G, and in an apples to apples DDR2 comparison performs essentially the same or worse.

    Is it just a "GTS 250" type rebrand to get some headlines prior to LGA-1156? If so, AMD can suck it for wasting our time and ruining your weekend. Fake "New Release!" PR is the epitome of lame.
  • quanta - Thursday, August 6, 2009 - link

    Do you even read the article? The 785G north bridge uses a newer UVD2 core, which does reduce CPU utilization over the 780G with Blu-Ray playback. However, the rest of the the north bridge and the SB710 south bridge still sound like the GTS 250 deal.
  • QChronoD - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    I don't understand why AMD wouldn't want to have this feature. It sounds like the chip is perfectly capable of doing it and they have to add a block so it can't be used.
    Oh well, i guess that's why I'm an engineer and not in marketing.
  • Marquis - Tuesday, August 4, 2009 - link

    The measure of a person's character is not how they act when they are right, but how they act when they are wrong.

    You, sir, have proven to have character in spades.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now