We received numerous emails and forum messages after our last X58 articles requesting that we take a different look at this platform. One that is not consumer/gaming oriented and instead focuses on the workstation capabilities of Intel's latest platform featuring the i7/X58. With that in mind we have been working diligently on a new test suite oriented towards the workstation crowd. The problem we discovered is that one could end trying to procure and test so many various programs that the review never gets done.

Believe me, that is one bad habit of mine after reviewing my initial rough draft for our first user experience article. After melding a few spreadsheets, pasting together all of the test notes, and looking at the results, it hit me that we had tested 83 different components, 22 games, and 37 different applications, not too mention a dizzying combination of hardware combinations for the memory and overclock results. The outcome is that this article is now under the editor's knife for obvious reasons. Probably the primary reason is to keep the reader awake and focused on the actual motherboard being reviewed, which happens to be the Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P before we move on the 790GX/GF9300 products.

So, for those readers who are passionate about viewing workstation results, we would like to hear from you again. Mainly, what are your top three to five programs that you would like to see tested on this platform. While we have procured several video/audio content creation applications along with other business centric programs, we fully realize there is diversity in the workstation market. With that in mind, we want to focus our efforts on providing relevant coverage and results for the top applications where possible. We use the word possible, as procuring a $40K seat license for a particular CAD/CAM package will probably be outside our current scope as one example. Also, we want to tailor the test suite to the hardware received for review.

That said, the wizards over at Super Micro Computer, Inc. sent us their new 5046A-XB bare bones workstation. This kit features the C7X58 motherboard, a high quality 865W power supply, custom designed cooling system, pre-configured Hot-Swappable drive setup, and a Tower case that feels as if it were built out of granite. The base bare bone 5046A-XB MSRP is around $900 and will vary depending upon the options chosen. Based on current test results, this Supermicro solution is a bargain to us.

We are still wrestling with our first 24GB memory kits (not a board problem), but all of our initial tests indicate that Supermicro has done a wonderful job with this platform. We have not needed or required multiple BIOS releases for stable operation, the custom cooling system is very quiet, the case is easy to work with and the internal wiring is impeccable. As an added bonus, the hot-swappable bays are a breeze to use, especially considering the number of times we installed and removed some firmware challenged Seagate drives. We are still working on 24GB memory results and some additional digital content creation tests, but performance has been flawless so far.

To say we are pleased at this point would be a serious understatement. Besides a meticulous design, customer service and technical support has been superb to date. We will be back with a full review, but this product already has our blessing. In the meantime, drop us a note and let us know your opinions on workstation benchmarks.

Comments Locked

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • trainey - Friday, January 23, 2009 - link

    I agree: Gaussian 03 tests would be fantastic
  • turner01 - Wednesday, January 21, 2009 - link

    Thank you for reviewing this equipment. Kudos

    I look forward to this review very much. I hope you were able to get some graphics benchmarks for us CAD users. I would like to see some day a comparison of professional vs. gaming cards on CAD programs. I wonder how much difference the professional cards make.

    Another point of interest for me on this type of machine is the Raid setup, a Raid card comparison is also on my wish list. I have Areca and Highpoint cards.
  • Lehm - Monday, January 26, 2009 - link

    +1 on the request for Gaming vs Professional cards. This would be invaluable. I'm surprised more haven't done it already.
  • cjcoats - Thursday, January 22, 2009 - link

    One thing that comes to mind is large GIS
    applications. The
    GRASS GIS is open source (so the price
    is right) and originally came from US Army Corps of Engineers work; see
    http://grass.ibiblio.org/">http://grass.ibiblio.org/

    Windows support is quite new, but 64-bit versions are easily available under Linux. For some simpler examples, see
    http://www.grassbook.org/;">http://www.grassbook.org/;
    if you'd like some larger ones (Continental US at 30 meters resolution), contact me...

    Also under Linux,
    I have meteorology
    modeling and air quality modeling
    benchmarks in-house.

    And it will be interesting to see
    how performance is
    affected by large-RAM configurations vs
    huge-RAM configurations; some met benchmarks we've done show a 20% speedup when going from 8GB to 32GB for
    an executable with
    a working-set size of only 1.5 GB (i.e., how much does
    OS-level I/O caching
    help you?).
  • Patrese - Sunday, January 25, 2009 - link

    I would also love some GIS benchmarks, specially the ones analysing some huge raster files. There's a free software called Spring that does it.
    Also, perhaps you could grab a free license from Bentley of ESRI for some MicroStation Descartes, ArcGIS tests... It's kinda a free ad for them, can't see why they wouldn't give it to you. Thanks a lot!
  • ssj4Gogeta - Thursday, January 22, 2009 - link

    I don't know if this is relevant here:

    http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539&...">http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539&...


    It's a guide to soft mod your GeForce into a Quadro. I've never used a professional gfx card. I came across this guide so I though I'll post the link.

    The guide says that the only difference between professional and gaming cards is that the drivers are better optimized in professional ones for professional software. But you noramlly can't install a Quadro driver on a GeForce card. Following this guide apparently lets you do that and get the benefits of Quadro. They've also provided improvement numbers.
  • MilesT - Thursday, January 22, 2009 - link

    I've done the bootstrap mod to convert an 8800GTS 320MB card into the equivalent Quadro, and the difference isn't noticible unless you have a seriously big model on screen in CAD. But with a big model, it sure does make a difference. I would estimate i had over a million verticies on screen for my testing. with the unmodded card, i was averaging 8-9 fps, but with the softmod, it was managing over 20. So yes, they do make a difference. so if you're going to be using cad in a non-professional environment (ie, use in small business or home), go for the equivalent non-quadro card and do the softmod to save yourself a good few hundred dollars.
  • kyleb2112 - Thursday, January 22, 2009 - link

    Yes, a comparison of gaming cards vs professional is long overdue. Graphics professionals are always having to make that call with next to zero direct comparison data--and just a lot of opinions on message boards.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now