SYSMark 2007 Performance

Our journey starts with SYSMark 2007, the only all-encompassing performance suite in our review today. The idea here is simple: one benchmark to indicate the overall performance of your machine.

SYSMark 2007 - Overall

Overall performance under SYSMark is pretty balanced for the Athlon II X3 435. It's faster than the $99 quad-core (620) but slightly slower than the quad core 630. We're slower than the old triple core Phenom II X3 720 though.

SYSMark 2007 - E-Learning

SYSMark 2007 - Video Creation

SYSMark 2007 - Productivity

SYSMark 2007 - 3D

Index Adobe Photoshop CS4 Performance
POST A COMMENT

178 Comments

View All Comments

  • maddoctor - Wednesday, October 21, 2009 - link

    No, Bulldozer will never come because Intel will kill it with Sandy Bridge and if they successfully launch it, its fates will like Barcelona failure. I believe after this failure, Intel will make everyone happay with its cheaper product because Intel does not need a competitor. I like this situation. Reply
  • SunSamurai - Sunday, November 01, 2009 - link

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=96&a...">http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=96&a...

    Oh look a cheaper AMD CPU outperforming a more expensive Intel CPU

    SUCK ON IT.
    Reply
  • maddoctor - Wednesday, October 21, 2009 - link

    AMD Bulldozer hype will be ended with the most powerful processor in the world with Intel Sandy Bridge. BTW, If you have realized that Intel is better, don't go with crappy AMD processor. They could not design a processor like powerful Intel Processor. Reply
  • maddoctor - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Good argument, these craps are better to placed it in the toilet. Who will buy these craps except AMDiot. Reply
  • narrenschip - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    What are the parameters/settings for the blender redering test? The description mentions 'a character that comes with the application', but as far as I know, there are no models/scenes included with the program.

    W;-)
    Reply
  • Gary Key - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    We utilize the Flying Squirrel image for our render benchmark -
    http://graphicall.org/bbb/chars/flyingsquirrel.ble...">http://graphicall.org/bbb/chars/flyingsquirrel.ble...
    Reply
  • deimos3428 - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    It's nice to see some more low-end chips come out, but I'm not sure that there's all that much of a market for anything between say an Athlon II X2 240 and a Phenom II X2 550/Athlon II X4 620. Choice is good, but too much choice can get very confusing. Reply
  • Taft12 - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    That's why they're phasing out the Phenom II X2 and X3. It's a confusing time because there is a lot of Phenom II in the channel still, but soon the 705e, 905e, 945, 955 and 965 will be the only Phenom II CPUs available, the rest will be Athlon II. Reply
  • deimos3428 - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    Which has nothing to do with blender rendering. Oops. Reply
  • Slash621 - Tuesday, October 20, 2009 - link

    I am extremely happy that you are utilizing an excel benchmark. I operate some huge models between access and excel and learning which processor will provide the best bang for the buck is of great business importance to me. Thanks again for all your hard work Anandtech Crew! Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now