ATI Radeon HD 4350 and 4550: Great HTPC Solutions

55 Comments

View All Comments

• superflex - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  Using a $1450 processor, $240 mobo, $300 RAM and $400 PSU to test a $40 GPU is assanine. That does no service to the HTPC end user.

• strikeback03 - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  It is their standard graphics test bed, you can't very well make comparisons if you are changing non-tested hardware around.
  
  They probably shouldn't have bothered posting anything on these though until they were done with the HTPC portions, judging by all the complaints in the comments.

• deruberhanyok - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  Yeah, it would be completely irrational to have a second standard test system for mid-range parts and a third for these lower end ones. I mean, what do you think this is, a tech website?

• PAPutzback - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  Something along the lines of it being tested in hybrid mode if it is capable with an HTPC type setup. IE, low watt fanless PSU, and low watt processor.
  
  The new game should not be benchmarks scores but more about what is the leat wattage I can make a PC and still have all the function of a Media HTPC. No gaming.
  
  I was really disappointed seeing as Anand has a theater blog on the site and this would of been a perfect setup to test along with his theater.

• whosthere - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  Derek,
  You guys published an article on G45 a few days back, then why didn't you show any G45 numbers in this article and still showing the antiquated G35 numbers?
  
  
  

• fic2 - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  Looking forward to the article on how well a 4870 runs on an Atom based computer.
  
  Got to go google for articles on how well a Landrover does on an F1 track.
  
  What a waste of an article. Best thing that can be said is that trees died for it.

• archer75 - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  The ATI cards have problems with some receivers and TV's. It has to do with the EDID and is documented over at avsforums.com
  This affects some Onkyo, Denon and Yamaha receivers.

• madspartus - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  Honestly why did you pair a $40 graphics card with a qx processor at 3.2 ghz...it just doesnt make any sense.
  
  Then showing power consumption differences on that system using a qx processor and 1200W power supply where the power used by the video card is little more than a unmentionable blip.
  
  next time would you try testing it in a system we might actually use this hardware in, like HTPC which you said yourself.
  
  maybe compare the power consumption to an IGP solution...and use a ~300W power supply etc.
  
  All those graphs were of no value to someone who wants to evaluate this thing for HTPC.

• duploxxx - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  I agree, keep the review in reality and put this in a 780-790 mobo with x2 6000 or 6500 and an intel p45 with e5xxx - e7xxx series.
  
  that would give a realistic platform

• Varkyl - Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - link

  I would also like to know what kind of temperatures these cards are running at. If they are anything like their big brother 4850 they run very hot. So before I even think about buying one of these I would like to know that it isn't adding an incredible amount of heat to my HTPC.