As we reported earlier this month, most motherboard vendors' production schedules seem to indicate a mid-March release of Intel's next enthusiast-level X48 Express chipset. The rumor is that final silicon production is in full swing, and delivery to tier-one partners is occurring for product release in March - just in time for that lull between CeBIT and Computex. Recent delays in the release of X48 have given NVIDIA the breathing room they desperately need in order to prepare their upcoming 790i chipset, so we should see a near-simultaneous launch of the latest Intel based enthusiast offerings. History has shown us that even the smallest setback when it comes to the introduction of products intended to compete with a rival's new offerings can ultimately mean the difference between success and failure in the marketplace.

On one hand, NVIDIA knows their SLI technology has won the hearts and minds of a significant share of today's gamers and professional benchmarkers. Because of this, and somewhat against their will, Intel is forced to rely heavily on AMD's ability to positively establish their products as the leader in the high-performance graphics market. In the end, two major factors primarily determine which platform is "best" for the enthusiast: A) Just how well it ends up overclocking the latest processors and memory combinations, and B) graphics cards compatibility, including multi-GPU solutions. In an ideal world, we would be able to make our decision independent of the second point. Unfortunately, this has not been the case for some time now. NVIDIA's reluctance to extend SLI technology licensing to single-socket Intel platforms has resulted in a rather large conflict of interest for gaming enthusiasts worldwide - build around a less-than-stellar overclocking platform with amazing graphics performance, or forgo SLI altogether and concentrate on what we believe is a much more mature solution at this time, which only comes with owning an Intel chipset.

However, NVIDIA's day of reckoning is fast approaching. Their failure to open SLI to Intel chipset owners has made them less than popular in some circles, and with Intel just months away from introducing their next big platform interconnection technology (Quick Path), this could prove to be their undoing. Whether or not Intel offers NVIDIA a Quick Path license will effectively determine if NVIDIA's chipset development division will continue business as usual. Additionally, Intel's plans to soon enter the discrete graphics market, coupled with the possibility that NVIDIA may not receive a Quick Path license, may spell the end of SLI as we know it on the Intel platform in the near future.

If this scenario plays out, we would all likely be forced into a position where the purchase of a single component would then artificially limit some of the other hardware we could choose in order to complete our system builds. AMD would have their current Spider platform and next generation update, based on the combination of Phenom quad-core processors, AMD 7-series chipsets, and ATI Radeon 3800-4xxx series GPUs running in CrossFire (thanks to their late-2006 acquisition of ATI). Intel would offer next-generation Nehalem/Bloomfield CPUs on Quick Path motherboards, to be paired with one or more of their "Larabee" graphics cards. NVIDIA would be left to offer SLI support for their GPUs with 780/790 chipsets, and beyond that who really knows about the multi-GPU market. Without a doubt, there are interesting times ahead for this section of the market.


With Intel's X48 Express chipset launch less than one month away, ASUS has provided us with a near perfect sample of yet another great product for those looking to build their next ultimate overclocking system. Appropriately dubbed the "P5E3 Premium", this motherboard is much more than just a re-spin of their popular P5E3 Deluxe platform with the X48. The temptation for companies like ASUS to merely replace the X38 chipset with the pin-to-pin compatible X48 chipset and then remarket the board under a different name must be great. We would have a hard time giving a nod to the P5E3 Premium if this were the only change, especially to those that already own an X38 board. However, this is hardly the case. Simply looking over the board, we can find very few design layouts common to both the "Deluxe" and "Premium" variants of the P5E3. This is also reflected in the PCB revision silkscreened on the board, which has gone from 1.03G on the P5E3 Deluxe to 2.00G on the P5E3 Premium.

Some of the more notable improvements, which we will cover later in more detail, are the use of a 3-phase DDR3 memory power circuit as well as a 2-phase design for the MCH (Northbridge), something we have only previously seen on a few of the as-of-yet unreleased X48 boards from Gigabyte. We cannot say the decision to upgrade these power delivery systems surprises us; overclocking success is much more dependent on clean, reliable power lines than some might realize. Adding additional phases to a power regulation circuit is a great way to reduce the circuit's transient response time. For the user, this means the system is able to tolerate larger, faster total load changes, a crucial requirement in maintaining stability when components are being run well above their rated speeds. In addition, the extra current handling capabilities of the extra pair(s) of MOSFETs help to ensure the circuit does not become overloaded to the point of failure should an enthusiastic user decide to push their board far beyond recommended operating limits.

Although not directly marketed towards the extreme gaming crowd, the P5E3 Premium does well in that respect, matching other CrossFire solutions easily. Clearly, however, the focus is on overclocking and features. As with other X48 boards tested in this class, we had no problems running a 400MHz FSB stable overclock at stock MCH voltage (1.25V), which has become our somewhat de-facto test when it comes to judging a new board's worthiness to receive a more in-depth review. ASUS wisely chose to include their new MCH Read Delay adjustment BIOS features with this board, something we explored in detail in our ASUS ROG Rampage Formula review. They have also gone to great lengths to improve their CPU and Northbridge GTL (Gunning Transceiver Logic) tuning circuit implementations. Users now have the ability to tune GTL set points per die using much more precise stepping values (0.005x increments).

Now let's take a closer look at the design and layout of this board.

Board Layout and Features
POST A COMMENT

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • AllanLim - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    My bad...missed those. Reply
  • AllanLim - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    But I still maintain my position until retail samples show up... Reply
  • squito - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    I can still taste the RDRAM and i820 motherboards ... Reply
  • Orbs - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    The introduction to the article aludes to the fact that in the not-too-distant future, we may have to choose platforms at the expense of component choices such as graphics cards.

    I think that's already the case and has been for some time. If I want an Intel-based mobo, say goodbye to SLI. If I want SLI, I have to choose nVidia's chipset.

    Unless Intel's next platform makes it impossible to choose any graphics card (not multi-card solution, but single-card) then it's no worse than what we have today.

    That said, I think we would all welcome the ability to run any two (or three) add-in cards in SLI or CrossFire for graphics and/or physics on any motherboard. That would make it much easier to decide which components to buy as we could judge them on their individual merits and not on what limitations they impose on the rest of the system.
    Reply
  • Cykoth - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    You know? This is all well and good....but Anandtech has never completed the review of the Asus Striker II Formula. Based upon the quick blog put out by them, and the feature set, I purchased one for my new build. I had NOTHING but trouble out of it. Even after BIOS updates, extra case fans, and finally an 18Inch fan stuck in the side of the case, it still wouldn't run stabily. I even had problems with the LAN adapters accepting dynamic IP's and therefore no gateway to the internet. Then, no response from ASUS tech support at all. I used to be a HUGE Asus fan....but I've RMA'ed that piece O' crap, and am waiting on my P35 chipset Gigabyte so I can have a system that doesn't REQUIRE water cooling to function.

    Really Anandtech.....will you EVER complete the Striker II Formula review? I'm interested to know how you got it to work.

    Cyko
    Reply
  • tmarques - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    The winbond chip is the SuperIO or hardware monitoring chip.
    The BIOS chip in ASUS new motherboards is, usually, a flash SPI chip, that sits next to the SPI debug connector.
    The P5E3 Premium SPI BIOS chip and connector are next to the CMOS battery.
    Reply
  • kjboughton - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    Yep, you're absolutely right. Confused the chip with something else. Thank you. Reply
  • RobinBee - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    I see these logos on AnandTech's pictures.

    These (ASUS) logos must be removed, before using a motherboard.

    Does AnandTech test MBs without removing those logos?

    If so, a MB's passive cooling is not optimal.
    Reply
  • Rajinder Gill - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    The 'Ai Lifestyle' logo is glued onto the Southbridge heatsink block. Even if removed, there are no fins to take advantage of the airflow, other than the slightly reduced thermal resistance - no real gains in removal there.

    The blue Asus logo plate has a heatpipe passing thru it, via a hole on the left of the Nortbridge heatsink. Meaning one would have to break or cut it, to take it off the heatsink. Obviously, there would be some benefit to removal, but perhaps the benefits of an active warranty are better than 2-3 degrees of temp drop..

    We tend only to remove things that are removable by design, in this case neither of those logo plates are designed to be removed.. Hence we have no issue chagning out thermal paste if we deem it necessary.

    regards
    Reply
  • supremelaw - Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - link

    Forgive me if this question reveals my ignorance
    on this one point: I obviously need answers,
    and still don't have answers ...

    As someone who is responsible for keeping several
    backup copies of a database up-to-date, I have
    found that x4 PCI-Express lanes cause a lower
    ceiling on the performance of RAID 0 storage
    than x8 PCI-Express lanes in any given expansion
    slot.

    One of the reasons why we purchased the ASUS
    P5W64 WS Professional, is the use of 4 x x16 slots
    which can be assigned 8-8-4-8 PCI-Express lanes
    (one option mentioned in the User Manual).

    The better RAID controllers that we are considering
    all require x8 PCI-Express lanes, instead of x4 lanes,
    e.g. Areca, Highpoint, etc.

    Someone is now going to recommend here that
    we forego SLI or Crossfire and use one of the
    x16 video slots for the RAID controller.

    OK: I don't mind going without dual video cards,
    because I don't need to live and work on the
    bleeding edge of graphics technology.

    BUT ... here's the rub: if you contact Tech Support
    at the companies that manufacture RAID controllers,
    they are typically unable to confirm if their x8 lane
    controllers will work in x16 video slots.

    "Try it and tell us what happens," they all say!

    If that combination does NOT work, the RAID controller
    must be inserted in the only remaining x16 slot,
    which only gets x4 PCI-Express lanes, NOT x8!

    That combination just proves that such motherboards
    were the WRONG CHOICE from day one.


    I thought that PCI-Express was designed to provide
    greater speed for most peripheral subsystems,
    NOT JUST graphics cards.


    WHAT GIVES?


    Sincerely yours,
    /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
    Webmaster, Supreme Law Library
    http://www.supremelaw.org/">http://www.supremelaw.org/
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now