The Test

Our test configuration is identical to what we used in our Athlon 64 X2 3800+ review, however we can’t disclose the motherboard used for the Yonah platform.  We can say that it used the Intel 945G chipset and was outfitted with 2 x 512MB DDR2-533 DIMMs; the rest of the configuration remained the same as the AMD and Intel systems.   

Once again, keep in mind that the platform and processor are pre-release samples, and performance could change by the time the parts head to retail. This is nothing more than a preview, so treat it as such.

Business Winstone 2004

Business Winstone 2004 tests the following applications in various usage scenarios:

. Microsoft Access 2002
. Microsoft Excel 2002
. Microsoft FrontPage 2002
. Microsoft Outlook 2002
. Microsoft PowerPoint 2002
. Microsoft Project 2002
. Microsoft Word 2002
. Norton AntiVirus Professional Edition 2003
. WinZip 8.1

Business Winstone 2004

Just as we saw in the Dothan vs. Yonah tests, Yonah loses some of its competitive edge in the Business Winstone benchmark. Although in this case, it's not very far off the Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

Office Productivity SYSMark 2004

SYSMark's Office Productivity suite consists of three tests, the first of which is the Communication test. The Communication test consists of the following:

"The user receives an email in Outlook 2002 that contains a collection of documents in a zip file. The user reviews his email and updates his calendar while VirusScan 7.0 scans the system. The corporate web site is viewed in Internet Explorer 6.0. Finally, Internet Explorer is used to look at samples of the web pages and documents created during the scenario."

Communication SYSMark 2004

Yonah manages to be quite competitive in the SYSMark tests, slightly outpacing the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ here.

The next test is Document Creation performance, which shows very little difference in drive performance between the contenders:

"The user edits the document using Word 2002. He transcribes an audio file into a document using Dragon NaturallySpeaking 6. Once the document has all the necessary pieces in place, the user changes it into a portable format for easy and secure distribution using Acrobat 5.0.5. The user creates a marketing presentation in PowerPoint 2002 and adds elements to a slide show template."

Document Creation SYSMark 2004

Here we see that at 2.0GHz, Intel's Yonah is right in the middle of AMD's Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and the X2 3800+. Given that the CPU has no on-die memory controller, yet performs comparably to an identically clocked Athlon 64 X2, it's not a bad position to be in for Yonah.

The final test in our Office Productivity suite is Data Analysis, which BAPCo describes as:

"The user opens a database using Access 2002 and runs some queries. A collection of documents are archived using WinZip 8.1. The queries' results are imported into a spreadsheet using Excel 2002 and are used to generate graphical charts."

Data Analysis SYSMark 2004

The Data Analysis test is dominated by the Pentium D, but even the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ holds a slight advantage over the 2.0GHz Yonah.

Yonah vs. Dothan Multimedia Content Creation Performance
POST A COMMENT

135 Comments

View All Comments

  • monsoon - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    i am waiting for overclocking tests and most of all the coming release of a MAC MINI with this baby inside. I'm going to run windows on it if possible ( so does it come with VT or not ? ). Hopefully january won't be a let down from apple... Reply
  • tfranzese - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    Are you dense?

    Ask yourself: What's the mini's price point? Now, what do you think this chip's price point will be?

    I think you're dreaming.
    Reply
  • Furen - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    I wouldnt quite put it like that. I think single-core Yonahs will find themselves thrown into the cheaper Mac Minis, I dunno if apple will actually make a premium version with the dual-core CPUs. Reply
  • forPPP - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    I don't understand all those comments that AMD is 2 year ahead because Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is on average 8% faster.
    Yohan is MOBILE cpu, while Athlon 64 X2 is desktop. Please compare Yohan with Turion and then complain.
    Intel has lead with 65 nm technology which means AMD won't catch it up for very long in mobile market. Turion dual core at 90 nm will be far far behind Yohan.
    Reply
  • rpsgc - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Please compare Yohan with Turion and then complain.


    Yonah is a 65nm dual-core, Turion is a 90nm single-core....
    Reply
  • forPPP - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    [quote]Yonah is a 65nm dual-core, Turion is a 90nm single-core....[/quote]
    And that's why for now there is nothing to compare. Yonah is its in own class. Even "Turion Dual Core" will be behind it, because of power consumption problem.
    Reply
  • tfranzese - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Yonah is its in own class.


    Really? I can't pick a notebook up today that has one, so comparing a processor that's been shipping for quite some time to this one means little.

    Further, no one seems to point it out, but does Yonah not have 64-bit extensions? If not, now that near every desktop CPU sold today has them it'd be a real shame if 64-bit Windows development gained momentum.
    Reply
  • forPPP - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Further, no one seems to point it out, but does Yonah not have 64-bit extensions? If not, now that near every desktop CPU sold today has them it'd be a real shame if 64-bit Windows development gained momentum.

    Great point. You are right. It's the biggest disadvantage of the Yonah.
    Reply
  • Viditor - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    quote:

    Even "Turion Dual Core" will be behind it, because of power consumption problem


    WHAT power consumption problem?
    Reply
  • Shintai - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    Maybe the power problem with adding over twice the transistors.

    Dothan->Yonah ~140mio to ~151mio ~8% more transistors
    Turion->Turion X2 ~105mio to ~233mio(X2 current) ~121% more transistors.

    And transistors = powerusage.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now