For months we’ve been waiting to take advantage of NVIDIA’s SLI and it’s looking like the tier one motherboard manufacturers will be doing their best to bring the first nForce4 SLI motherboards to market before the end of this year.  So is SLI all it’s cracked up to be? 

With a final board and final drivers, it’s time to look at SLI from a final perspective to see if NVIDIA squandered the opportunity to regain technology and performance leadership or if SLI is really everything it used to be…

How SLI Works

NVIDIA’s Scalable Link Interface (SLI) is based on the simple principle of symmetric distribution of load, meaning that the architecture depends on (and will only really work) if both GPUs get the exact same load as one another.  The nature of NVIDIA’s SLI indicates that odd combinations such as cards with different clock speeds or GPU feature sets (e.g. 16-pipes + 8 pipes) will not work; NVIDIA’s driver will run all cards at the lowest common clock speed, but there’s nothing you can do about trying to get different GPUs to work in SLI mode, the driver simply won’t let you enable the option. 

NVIDIA’s first task in assuring that the load distributed to both GPUs would be balanced and symmetrical was to equip their nForce4 SLI chipset with identical width PCI Express graphics slots.  By default, PCI Express graphics cards use a x16 slot, which features 16 PCI Express lanes offering 8GB/s of total bandwidth.  Instead of outfitting their chipsets with 16 more PCI Express lanes, NVIDIA simply allows the number of lanes to be reconfigurable to either a single x16 slot or two x8 slots, with the use of a little card on the motherboard itself.  The physical slots themselves are both x16 slots, but electrically they can be configured to be two x8 slots.  This won’t cause any compatibility issues with x16 cards, as they will just use fewer lanes for data transfers, and the real world performance impact is negligible in games, which is what NVIDIA is counting on.

The next trick is to make sure that the GPUs receive the exact same vertex data from the CPU, which is done by the CPU sending all vertex data to the primary GPU and then the primary GPU forwards it on to the secondary GPU.  Once data arrives at the primary GPU via the PCI Express bus, all GPU to GPU communication is handled via NVIDIA’s video bridge.  The video bridge is a bus that connects directly to the GPU and is used for transferring data from the frame buffer of one GPU directly to the next.  NVIDIA isn’t offering too much information on the interface, other than saying that it is capable of transferring data at up to 10GB/s.  While it is possible to have this GPU-to-GPU communication go over the PCI Express bus, NVIDIA insists that it would be silly to do so because of latency issues and bandwidth constraints, and has no plans in moving in that direction. 

NVIDIA’s driver plays an important role in maintaining symmetry in the rendering by looking at the workload and making two key decisions: 1) determining rendering method, and depending on the rendering method, 2) determining the workload split between the two GPUs. 

NVIDIA supports two main rendering methods: Alternate Frame Rendering (AFR) and Split Frame Rendering (SFR).  As the names imply, AFR has each GPU render a separate frame (e.g. GPU 1 renders all odd frames and GPU 2 renders all even frames) while SFR splits up the rendering of a single frame amongst the two GPUs.  NVIDIA’s driver does not determine whether to use AFR or SFR on the fly, instead NVIDIA’s software engineers have profiled the majority of the top 100 games and created profiles for each and every one, determining whether they should default to AFR or SFR mode in each game.  NVIDIA’s driver defaults to AFR as long as there are no dependencies between frames; for example, in some games that use slow motion special effects the game itself doesn’t clear the frame buffer and will render the next frame on top of the previous frame, alpha blending the two frames together to get the slow motion effect – in this case there is a frame to frame dependency and AFR cannot be used. 

If AFR can’t be used, the SFR is used but now the driver must determine how much of each frame to send to GPU 1 vs. GPU 2.  Since the driver can count on both GPUs being the exact same speed (see why it’s important?), it makes an educated guess on what the load split should be.  The educated guess comes through the use of a history table that stores the load each GPU was placed under for the past several frames.  Based on the outcomes stored in this history table, NVIDIA’s driver will make a prediction of what the rendering split should be between the two GPUs for future frames and will adjust the load factor accordingly.  This should all sound very familiar to anyone who has ever heard of a branch predictor in a CPU, and just like a branch predictor there is a penalty for incorrectly predicting.  If NVIDIA’s driver predicts incorrectly one GPU will finish its rendering task much sooner than the other, giving it nothing to do but wait until the other GPU is done, thus reducing the overall performance potential of the SLI setup. 

By now you can begin to see where the performance benefits of SLI come into play.  With twice the GPU rendering power you effectively have a 32-pipe 6800GT with twice as much memory bandwidth if you pair two of the cards together, a configuration that you won’t see in a single card for quite some time.  At the same time you should see that SLI does have a little bit of overhead associated with it, and at lower CPU-bound resolutions you can expect SLI to be slightly slower than a single card.  Then again, you don’t buy an SLI setup to run at lower resolutions. 

Once both GPUs have completed their rendering, whether in AFR or SFR mode, the secondary GPU sends its frame buffer to the primary GPU via NVIDIA’s video bridge.  The important thing here is that the data is sent digitally, so there’s no loss in image quality as a result of SLI.  The primary GPU recombines the data and outputs the final completed frame (or frames) through its outputs.  Sounds simple enough, right?

Surprisingly enough, throughout all of our testing, we didn’t encounter any rendering issues in SLI mode.  NVIDIA insists that they have tested quite a few of the top 100 games to ensure that there aren’t any issues with SLI mode and it does seem that they’ve done a good job with their driver.  If the driver hasn’t been profiled with a game, it will default to single-GPU mode to avoid any rendering issues, but the user can always force SLI mode if they wish. 

ASUS’ A8N-SLI Deluxe
POST A COMMENT

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • bob661 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    #18
    The hardcore gamers would just buy new video cards.
    Reply
  • reboos - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    "Nvidia bought the patents, pending patent applications, trademarks, brand names, and chip inventory related to the graphics business of 3dfx."

    http://slashdot.org/articles/00/12/15/2244256.shtm...
    Reply
  • fuzzynavel - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    I think 3DFX were bought by nvidia...or at least the rights to the technology....so it is technically the same company...I remember the days of 3DFX scan line interleave....fantastic! Reply
  • bob661 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    #17
    Two Opterons would be downright scary if they were limited too. But a 4000 is no slouch. :-) It's still amazing. I happen to agree with #12 but the real test of that theory would be to test slower CPU's and see how the performance scales.
    Reply
  • reboos - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    Odd as it may sound, should we be thanking 3DFX for this?

    http://slashdot.org/articles/00/12/15/2244256.shtm...
    Reply
  • Gnoad - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    Although SLI is exciting, I found myself wanting more info on the Asus board... Reply
  • haris - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    I just had some more thoughts about why SLI/Multi rendering might not be such a great move by Nvidia/ATI.

    When they launch their next generation cards they are expecting to rake in some extra money from the extreme gamers, right? What happens to that same card when they start purchasing relatively cheap last gen cards instead. This might then lead to something like this: In order for them to get that additional $ during the begining of the next gen card's life cycle they might have to slow down the production cycle of cards to give them more time in the high-end position.
    Reply
  • Jeff7181 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    #14... why? You have TWO GPU's here... and ONE CPU. Why is it so amazing that two GPU's can put the squeenze on one CPU? Now... stick a 6800U SLI setup with a couple Opteron 250's with an application that's multi-threaded and THEN I'd be amazed if it was still CPU limited. Reply
  • Aquila76 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    Or was that 330 Watts the total system usage? (doubtful) Reply
  • Aquila76 - Tuesday, November 23, 2004 - link

    What power supply was used in your testbed? If the SLI setup requires at load ~ 330 Watts, I would think you'd need around a 550W unit for your setup. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now