Introduction

The competition in the processor market has been fierce ever since the first Athlon processors were released in the fall of 1999. In the time since then, AMD and Intel have each led and followed at different times. We have seen each company develop its strong points and grow. This release marks the next evolution for AMD in an area in which they have been very solid since even before the Athlon's release: budget computing.

Today, AMD is introducing a processor to span the market between their long running Socket A platform and the first Athlon 64 platform, the Socket 754. AMD has quite a lot of experience with these two product lines, and it has been very cost-effective for them to reuse pre-existing technology in a new form at a much lower price point than current generation technology. And based heartily in that philosophy, we present the AMD Sempron line of budget processors.



AMD's Sempron logo


The Sempron processors, as we mentioned in this AnandTech Insider article last month, is AMD's "ron" placement to the Duron processor. The name is derived from the Latin word, Semper (meaning "always"), and the tech suffix -ron (which apparently means "budget processor"). Sempron should fall at a lower performance point than equivalent rated parts from other AMD processor lines. As this processor spans two platforms, it makes sense to compare the new Sempron to both the Athlon XP line of processors and current Athlon 64 processors. And as Sempron is a budget processor, it makes sense to compare it to Intel's budget line of processors.

While we've seen multiple architectures with similar names, to some extent, in the past, consumers will have to know this time around that their Semprons from 2800+ and down work with socket A platforms, and 3100+ and up work with socket 754 or even 939 in the future. Obviously, the pertinent information will be somewhere on the box or product description, but it would be nice if AMD could make this more clear through the name of the product.

We do understand the usefulness in having a single name under which to sell, but we're not quite convinced that the benefits outweigh possible consumer confusion in an already complex marketplace.

In the following pages, we will take a look at our standard budget CPU performance tests. As these processors are designed for budget markets, special attention will be paid to price/performance throughout the article. But first, let's take a look at the silicon behind the name.

UPDATE: The pricing info we recieved was altered at launch. AMD decided to raise their prices by over 17% on the low end (the 2400+ is up to $61 from $52), and between 5% and 6% on the high end (both the 2800+ and 3200+ prices are up $6). These small dollar ammount pricing changes make a large difference on budget processors and impact price/performance analysis quite a bit. Had we recieved pricing information on par with AMD's current numbers, we wouldn't have been quite so enthusiastic about Sempron's price/performance advanatge over Celeron D. At this point, the only price advantage Sempron has over Celeron is the higher availability of cheaper motherboards.

On a positive note, AMD has confirmed our suspicion that the NX bit and Cool'n'Quiet features of Athlon 64 will be available in K8 versions of the Sempron (3100+ and higher). The only A64 feature disabled in Sempron is x86-64.
Two Flavors are Better than One: Socket A
POST A COMMENT

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • Lonyo - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    No edit feature on comments?
    Also, you can get an 865 for $56 at Newegg (new, ASRock "P4I65GV" i865GV Motherboard for Intel Socket 478 CPU -RETAIL)
    So that means that the gap between systems is really only going to be $17 between a Sempron 2800+ system and a Celeron 335 system.
    Reply
  • Lonyo - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    Another point, the Sempron prices you quote are in 1000 unit quantities, so on the penultimate page, there is no point if comparing the cost of a system, unless you remember that the Sempron will be $10~$15 more expensive than the price you quote.

    Celeron 335 is $117 in 1000 unit quantities (on launch) and $127 at Newegg.
    The Sempron will probably also be $10 more than the 1000 unit price.
    Reply
  • Lonyo - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    Pages 9 and 10 both make reference to the Celeron 225.
    I think this may be a typo for 335, as there is no 225 in the review ;)
    Reply
  • Calin - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    I was thinking - what is the electrical power (in relation with the other Athlons)? I am somewhat interested in a small and silent computer (socketA based) , and I would like to know which of those processons would be the happiest in crammed conditions

    Calin
    Reply
  • clarkey01 - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    DerekWilson, yeah any chance you could have an 2.4Ghz Sempron going against a celeron @ The same speed. Reply
  • sandorski - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    I might get one when they come out for Socket 939, just because of cost issues. The SocketA versions certainly sucks when compared to the 754 version and with the limited future for Socket 754 there's nothing tempting for me. Reply
  • Spacecomber - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    I assume that the overclocking write-up will include the new Celerons, since I think that was skimmed over in the article covering their launch.

    When discussing the value of the new Celerons (assuming the this will be part of the overclocking write-up), backward compatability with older chipset motherboards would be helpful, too (e.g., 845E).

    I mentioned this in my comments to the Celeron write-up; so, my apologies for being repetitive.
    Reply
  • Stlr23 - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    Sempron huh?.....Nice. Reply
  • LeeBear - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    One 'budget' chip you didn't include in the roundup is the 2.4A Pentium 4 (Prescott, FSB533, 1MB Cache). It's cheaper then the Celeron 335 and with overclocking it may provide some interesting results.

    -LeeBear
    Reply
  • DerekWilson - Wednesday, July 28, 2004 - link

    We will be working on the overclock article over the next couple days -- is there anything you guys would particularly like to see? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now