Weeks ago we found a little info going around that Intel plans to rename their upcoming Socket T/Socket 478 processors to reflect a new naming convention.
Update April 8, 2004: After receiving more information and confirmation, we have updated our roadmaps.

You can read more about Intel's naming conventions on their site, here.

Without further ado:

2004 Pentium 4 Roadmap (5xx)
CPU
Manufacturing Process
Bus Speed
L2 Cache Size
Product Name
Pentium 4 EE 3.4GHz
130nm
800MHz
512KB
???
Pentium 4 EE 3.2GHz
130nm
800MHz
512KB
???
Pentium 4 4.0GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
580
Pentium 4 3.8GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
570
Pentium 4 M 3.6GHz
90nm
533MHz
1MB
558
Pentium 4 3.6GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
560
Pentium 4 M 3.46GHz
90nm
533MHz
1MB
552
Pentium 4 3.4GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
550
Pentium 4 3.2GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
540
Pentium 4 M 3.2GHz
90nm
533MHz
1MB
538
Pentium 4 M 3.06GHz
90nm
533MHz
1MB
532
Pentium 4 3.0GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
530
Pentium 4 2.8GHz
90nm
800MHz
1MB
520
Pentium 4 M 2.8GHz
90nm
533MHz
1MB
518

2004 Celeron Roadmap (3xx)
CPU
Manufacturing Process
Bus Speed
L2 Cache Size
Product Name
Celeron M 1.5GHz
90nm
400MHz
1MB
370
Celeron M 1.4GHz
90nm
400MHz
1MB
360
Celeron M ULV 1.0GHz
90nm
400MHz
512KB
358
Celeron M 1.3GHz
90nm
400MHz
1MB
350
Celeron 3.2GHz
90nm
533MHz
256KB
350
Celeron 3.06GHz
90nm
533MHz
256KB
345
Celeron M 1.5GHz
130nm
400MHz
512KB
340
Celeron 2.93Gz
90nm
533MHz
256KB
340
Celeron M ULV 900MHz
90nm
400MHz
512KB
338
Celeron 2.8GHz
90nm
533MHz
256KB
335
Celeron M 1.4GHz
130nm
400MHz
512KB
330
Celeron 2.66GHz
90nm
533MHz
256KB
330
Celeron 2.53GHz
90nm
533MHz
256KB
325
Celeron M 1.3GHz
130nm
400MHz
512KB
320

The new 90nm Celerons based on the Prescott core have bee dubbed "Celeron D." Note the suffix "LV" denotes "Low Voltage," while "ULV" denotes "Ultra Low Voltage." There is an unusual amount of overlap in the Celeron roadmaps, which may become confusing to consumers in the long run.

Finally, we have an update on the Pentium M naming convensions.

2004 Pentium M Roadmap (7xx)
CPU
Manufacturing Process
Bus Speed
L2 Cache Size
Product Name
Pentium M 2.13GHz
90nm
533MHz
2MB
770
Pentium M 2.0GHz
90nm
533MHz
2MB
760
Pentium M ULV 1.20GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
758
Pentium M 2.0GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
755
Pentium M LV 1.5GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
753
Pentium M 1.86GHz
90nm
533MHz
2MB
750
Pentium M 1.8GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
745
Pentium M 1.73GHz
90nm
533MHz
2MB
740
Pentium M ULV 1.10GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
738
Pentium M 1.70GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
735
Pentium M LV 1.40GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
733
Pentium M 1.60GHz
90nm
533MHz
2MB
730
Pentium M 1.60GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
725
Pentium M ULV 1.10GHz
130nm
400MHz
1MB
718
Pentium M 1.50GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
715
Pentium M 1.30GHz
90nm
400MHz
2MB
713

There are also several updates on the Nocona roadmaps. In particular, the Nocona (Xeon) launch has moved from Q2'03 to Q3'03. Expect to wait a little longer to run an x86-64 compatible Xeon.

POST A COMMENT

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • ceefka - Tuesday, March 30, 2004 - link

    Who can see the logic in this name game? Am I the only one who doesn't get it? Does a Pentium 4 3.4GHz 90nm perform 210 "bleeps" less than a Pentium 4 EE 3.4GHz 130nm (760 -/- 550 = 210)? Why lower numbers for 90nm CPU's?

    It looks like result of some formula : pipeline stages / GHz * IPC * FSB / nm. Ehm no, this doesn't add.

    Since Intel also says MHz is not everything, then what in their opinion does make the difference? I agree that they needed to make some kind of change because the GHz numbers are likely to go through the roof next year, especially if IPC stays on 6. Or not Intel?

    "Comparable" AMD and Intel processors trade #1 scores in benchmarks when put head to head. So time will tell what good a 720 or so is. Aren't y'all looking forward to the benchmarks on these?

    There's no timeline on these roadmaps. ??? That doesn't make it a roadmap, does it?
    Reply
  • Ecmaster76 - Tuesday, March 30, 2004 - link

    Maybe intel never plans on passing 4.6Ghz any time soon. Reply
  • Pumpkinierre - Tuesday, March 30, 2004 - link

    I imagine the quesion marks are a deep rethink on Intel's behalf.

    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now