AT News Update: Socket 775 Processor Names
by Kristopher Kubicki on April 8, 2004 1:07 PM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
Weeks ago
we found a little info going around that Intel plans to rename their upcoming
Socket T/Socket 478 processors to reflect a new naming convention.
Update April 8, 2004: After receiving more information and confirmation,
we have updated our roadmaps.
You can read more about Intel's naming conventions on their site, here.
Without further ado:
| 2004 Pentium 4 Roadmap (5xx) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Manufacturing
Process |
Bus
Speed |
L2
Cache Size |
Product Name |
| Pentium 4 EE 3.4GHz | 130nm |
800MHz |
512KB |
??? |
| Pentium 4 EE 3.2GHz | 130nm |
800MHz |
512KB |
??? |
| Pentium 4 4.0GHz | 90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
580 |
| Pentium 4 3.8GHz | 90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
570 |
| Pentium 4 M 3.6GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
1MB |
558 |
| Pentium 4 3.6GHz |
90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
560 |
| Pentium 4 M 3.46GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
1MB |
552 |
| Pentium 4 3.4GHz | 90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
550 |
| Pentium 4 3.2GHz | 90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
540 |
| Pentium 4 M 3.2GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
1MB |
538 |
| Pentium 4 M 3.06GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
1MB |
532 |
| Pentium 4 3.0GHz | 90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
530 |
| Pentium 4 2.8GHz | 90nm |
800MHz |
1MB |
520 |
| Pentium 4 M 2.8GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
1MB |
518 |
| 2004 Celeron Roadmap (3xx) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Manufacturing
Process |
Bus
Speed |
L2
Cache Size |
Product Name |
| Celeron M 1.5GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
1MB |
370 |
| Celeron M 1.4GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
1MB |
360 |
| Celeron M ULV 1.0GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
512KB |
358 |
| Celeron M 1.3GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
1MB |
350 |
| Celeron 3.2GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
256KB |
350 |
| Celeron 3.06GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
256KB |
345 |
| Celeron M 1.5GHz | 130nm |
400MHz |
512KB |
340 |
| Celeron 2.93Gz | 90nm |
533MHz |
256KB |
340 |
| Celeron M ULV 900MHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
512KB |
338 |
| Celeron 2.8GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
256KB |
335 |
| Celeron M 1.4GHz | 130nm |
400MHz |
512KB |
330 |
| Celeron 2.66GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
256KB |
330 |
| Celeron 2.53GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
256KB |
325 |
| Celeron M 1.3GHz | 130nm |
400MHz |
512KB |
320 |
The new 90nm Celerons based on the Prescott core have bee dubbed "Celeron D." Note the suffix "LV" denotes "Low Voltage," while "ULV" denotes "Ultra Low Voltage." There is an unusual amount of overlap in the Celeron roadmaps, which may become confusing to consumers in the long run.
Finally, we have an update on the Pentium M naming convensions.
| 2004 Pentium M Roadmap (7xx) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Manufacturing
Process |
Bus
Speed |
L2
Cache Size |
Product Name |
| Pentium M 2.13GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
2MB |
770 |
| Pentium M 2.0GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
2MB |
760 |
| Pentium M ULV 1.20GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
758 |
| Pentium M 2.0GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
755 |
| Pentium M LV 1.5GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
753 |
| Pentium M 1.86GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
2MB |
750 |
| Pentium M 1.8GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
745 |
| Pentium M 1.73GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
2MB |
740 |
| Pentium M ULV 1.10GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
738 |
| Pentium M 1.70GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
735 |
| Pentium M LV 1.40GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
733 |
| Pentium M 1.60GHz | 90nm |
533MHz |
2MB |
730 |
| Pentium M 1.60GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
725 |
| Pentium M ULV 1.10GHz | 130nm |
400MHz |
1MB |
718 |
| Pentium M 1.50GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
715 |
| Pentium M 1.30GHz | 90nm |
400MHz |
2MB |
713 |
There are also several updates on the Nocona roadmaps. In particular, the Nocona (Xeon) launch has moved from Q2'03 to Q3'03. Expect to wait a little longer to run an x86-64 compatible Xeon.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
33 Comments
View All Comments
ceefka - Tuesday, March 30, 2004 - link
Who can see the logic in this name game? Am I the only one who doesn't get it? Does a Pentium 4 3.4GHz 90nm perform 210 "bleeps" less than a Pentium 4 EE 3.4GHz 130nm (760 -/- 550 = 210)? Why lower numbers for 90nm CPU's?It looks like result of some formula : pipeline stages / GHz * IPC * FSB / nm. Ehm no, this doesn't add.
Since Intel also says MHz is not everything, then what in their opinion does make the difference? I agree that they needed to make some kind of change because the GHz numbers are likely to go through the roof next year, especially if IPC stays on 6. Or not Intel?
"Comparable" AMD and Intel processors trade #1 scores in benchmarks when put head to head. So time will tell what good a 720 or so is. Aren't y'all looking forward to the benchmarks on these?
There's no timeline on these roadmaps. ??? That doesn't make it a roadmap, does it?
Ecmaster76 - Tuesday, March 30, 2004 - link
Maybe intel never plans on passing 4.6Ghz any time soon.Pumpkinierre - Tuesday, March 30, 2004 - link
I imagine the quesion marks are a deep rethink on Intel's behalf.