MSI DR4-A

MSI took their time entering the DVD recordable market. You may recall that MSI has traditionally been one of the largest producers of optical storage products in the world! (This probably stemmed from their ability to produce drives cheaper than LiteOn without sacrificing too much quality). Like ASUS and Pioneer, the MSI DR4-A shares virtually the same specifications, chipset and bundle as the Sony DRU-510A. MSI already has a newer 8X burner comparable to the Sony DRU-530, which we will look at in a later roundup.

MSI's DR4-A does not seem up to par with their excellent line of motherboards. The media bundle was good — Sonic MyDVD and Ahead Nero's Burning Rom. Unfortunately, the single page of documentation that came with the drive was disappointing, to say the least. It looks as though MSI spent more time on the box art than what they put in the box.


 MSI DR4-A DVD-/+R Drive
Interface IDE
CD Write Speed 24X, 16X, 12X, 8X, 4X (CLV)
CD Rewrite Speed 10X, 4X (CLV)
CD Read Speed 40X Max (CAV)
DVD-R Write Speed 4X, 2X, 1X (CLV)
DVD-RW Rewrite Speed 2X, 1X (CLV)
DVD+R Write Speed 4X, 2.4X (CLV)
DVD+RW Rewrite Speed 2.4X (CLV)
DVD Read Speed 12X Max (CAV)
Supported Modes DAO / DAO-RAW 16 & 96
TAO
SAO / SAO 16 & 96
Packet Write
Multi-Session
Supported Formats DVD+R (incremental)
DVD+RW (random)
DVD-R (DAO, incremental, multi-border)
DVD-RW (restricted overwrite)

CD-R, CD-RW, CD-ROM, CD-DA,
CD-ROM XA, Mixed Mode, CD Extra
Photo CD, CD Text, Bootable CD, Mount Rainer
Access Time CD: 160ms
DVD: 200ms
Buffer 8MB

We enjoyed the fact that MSI/Sony went with an 8MB buffer on their 4X dual capable drives. Even though critics and skeptics argue that larger buffers will not help when it comes to burning a DVD, we feel that the proof is in the pudding. It costs the manufacturer literally a few cents to add a slightly larger buffer, but the benefit of lower errors pays off.

Our MSI burner was based on the LC99390K chipset, and used the same in the Sony DRU-510A. With the announcement of their DR8-A just last week, MSI will begin to phase back on the DR4-A some time after the holiday season. Unfortunately, for those of you who bought a DR4-A, your burner was only new for 4 months before it became obsolete.

ASUS DRW-0402P/D Sony DRU-530A
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • Icewind - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Wait, so in the Avg Write Column in your XLS sheet, thats TIME not The actually speed of the burner itself?

    Ok, looking at it, the way you have it labeled it looks alot more like the average speed the burner BURNED at, not the actual time.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    I apologize if there was a bias away from the LiteOn drive. It was unintentional.

    PXC, alexruiz: The DD0203 was originally supposed to be in this roundup, but I severed the cable taking it apart to look at the chipset :) It will be in the next roundup.

    Kristopher
  • pxc - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    What's up with the anti-LiteOn bias in the article? It didn't fail any tests like the NEC 1300A did, but it's trashed from first mention and in the conclusion.

    #15, I can tell you why the DD020x wasn't included: it's junk. I've had one for over a month now and it has the worst media compatibility of any dual format drive. Even the media that generally works will also fail 20% of the time. It would do Optorite no good to have it's buggy drive compared to working drives.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    My contacts at Plextor told me dual layer media is going to cost upwards of $10. Ill pass. I am more interested in BluRay anyway.

    Kristopher
  • artifex - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    I'd be willing to pay more than double the then DVD+R price for DVD+R dual layer media, assuming that hard drive prices haven't gone down much before then.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Belzer: Thank you for the feedback. I do appreciate your thoroughness and I have corrected a number of errors.

    I do digress concerning the MCC 003 Media, however. Not only does DVD Info Pro identify the media as 4X write, but the Verbatim box art also identifies the media as "1-4X".

    I have all of the images from CDSpeed, so it looks like i will be spending the rest of my friday uploading them and inserting them into the article. :)

    Good to be done with finals ;)

    Kristopher
  • alexruiz - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    A little surprised to find that some other available burners were not included:

    1) One of the most popular dual burners WAS NOT included (Optorite DD0203/DD0201) Furthermore, there is already available the 8x "+" version (DD0401)

    2) Another one is the BTC 1004IM, or the big brother, the 8x 1008IM that is supposed to write DVD-R at 8x also...

    Chistpher, can we include the Optorite DD0401 AND the BTC 1008IM for the next review?


    Alex
  • michec - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    When was this review done? The 8X dual-format Lite-On drive is not a drive that is being anticipated - it's already available. I got mine on Nov 30th at a local computer show. Why bother with reviewing 4x drives when there is a 8x version that is available? What a waste of time and energy reviewing the 4x Lite-On.
  • LoneWolf1 - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    In regards to #8. You may download our entire burn time spreadsheet.

    http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/storage/roundu...
  • Icewind - Friday, December 12, 2003 - link

    Heres a link

    http://www.cdfreaks.com/news2.php?ID=8051

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now