DFI NFII Ultra: Basic Features


 Motherboard Specifications
CPU Interface Socket-462
Chipset nForce2 Ultra 400 North Bridge
nForce2 MCP-T South Bridge
Bus Speeds 100 to 300MHz (in 1MHz increments)
Core Voltage 1.10 to 2.05V (in 0.0250V increments)
DRAM Voltage up to 2.80V (in 0.1V increments)
Chipset Voltage up to 1.90V (in 0.1V increments)
AGP Slots up to 1.80V (in 0.1V increments)
Memory Slots 3 184-pin DDR DIMM Slots
Expansion Slots 1 AGP 8X Slot
5 PCI Slots
Onboard IDE RAID HighPoint 372N controller (RAID 0, RAID 1, Raid 1.5 & RAID 0 + 1)
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 Six USB 2.0 ports supported by MCP-T
Agere FW803 IEEE-1394 FireWire (up to 3 ports available)
Onboard LAN Dual LAN:
nForce MCP-T 10/100 Ethernet
Realtek RTL8101L 10/100 Ethernet
Onboard Audio CMedia CMI9739A codec (nForce2 APU)
Onboard Serial ATA One SATA connector via Marvel 88i8030
BIOS Revision 6/25/2003 Release BIOS




The DFI NFII Ultra comes in a HUGE box containing the LanParty trademark components: PC Transpo carrying harness for hauling around your computer, a FULL selection of cables (including round UV reactive cables that match the board), and the flexible modular FrontX box that includes front microphone jack, USB, and Firewire. Other connectors can be added to further customize the FrontX box, which fits in a 5-1/4" bay, and can be purchased at www.frontx.com.




As you can see, the new DFI nForce2 is loaded! The board uses the latest nVidia nForce2 Ultra 400 chipset for official support of all Athlon chips, including the new 200FSB 3200+.





As in the other LanParty boards, the new NFII LanParty is UV reactive. It glows a soft green under black light, which seems to be the trademark color for AMD LanParty, since it is also used in the LanParty KT400A.

On boards using the MCP-T Southbridge, sound is provided by the excellent nVidia SoundStorm digital audio controllers built into the MCP-T. The manufacturer provides a compliant audio codec for the front-end that interfaces to Sound Storm. DFI uses the excellent cMedia codec – the same codec used on all three LanParty boards.




nVidia’s powerful MCP-T SouthBridge contains the nForce2 APU (Audio Processing Unit), which is designed around three functions. First, it supports hardware acceleration of 256 2D voices, 64 3D voices, and 3D positional audio. Second, full support is provided for Microsoft’s DX8.0 standard. Third, support is provided for Dolby Digital 5.1 and in-hardware Dolby Digital encoding. To take advantage of Dolby Digital, you must use an SPDIF connector with a receiver and the right speakers. Unfortunately, most nForce2 boards do not come with the proper SPDIF connectors, which basically make the wonderful features of the MCP-T a waste of audio power. Fortunately, the DFI comes with the accessory bracket that provides input and output coaxial SPDIF connections.

The NFII Ultra utilizes two 10/100 LAN controllers available in the nForce2 design. You get the familiar nForce2 10/100 Ethernet plus Realtek RTL8101L 10/100 LAN. For a machine with a name like LanParty, we can think of many situations where two LAN adapters could be very useful for a traveling gaming box. However, we are a bit surprised that DFI equipped the NFII Ultra with two 10/100 speed connections and decided not to include at least one Gigabit LAN option. In fairness, the two 10/100 connections will be just as useful in almost all situations, as there are very few situations where a LanParty gamer would find a real need for a Gigabyte LAN connection.




The DFI NFII Ultra I/O ports configuration is complete with two PS/2 ports, two serial ports, one parallel port, four USB 2.0 ports, two 10/100 LAN ports, and Mic In, Line In, and Line Out, which drive the onboard sound and are configurable for rear/sub/center outputs if desired. The microphone output is not lost since it is also available on the FrontX box. The DFI NFII Ultra also supports IEEE 1394 FireWire courtesy of a Agere FW803 controller, capable of supporting up to three ports (two ports on a rear bracket and an additional port on the FrontX break-out box). The dual-IEEE 1394 FireWire bracket is included, as are the SPDIF coax I/O bracket, a SATA cable and even that elusive SATA to molex power adapter required by some SATA drives.



The FrontX kit includes ports for MIC, Headphone, two USB, and Firewire. It is modular, so other options can be added. As already mentioned, a complete collection of matching round green UV reactive IDE cables and a floppy cable are also included, which will look well-coordinated in a window case. DFI even realized that there are still some who are attached to a favorite game controller (connects to a game port instead of USB), so a game port bracket is also included for those who won’t retire their favorite game-port device.




DFI uses the well-regarded HighPoint 372N RAID controller on the NFII Ultra – but with a twist. Included are the usual HighPoint options of RAID 0 (striping for performance), Raid 1 (Mirroring for security), and the four-drive option of RAID 0+1. However, as on the other LanParty boards, DFI has included a really slick RAID option, called RAID 1.5, which allows both striping and mirroring with just two drives. Basically, half of each drive in the 1.5 array is used for striping and the other half is used for performance. So, if you combine two 80GB drives in a 1.5 RAID, you would end up with a fast 80GB drive with mirroring. This is a really interesting option because it will allow faster performance with striping than the pair of 80GB drives set up for mirroring alone using RAID 1. The IDE drive support for this board is truly exceptional, since the HighPoint controller also allows single hard drives to be driven by the RAID chip with no special formatting required.

DFI apparently did not think SATA would matter a great deal on the nForce2 Ultra because a SATA RAID option is not on the board. The support for a single SATA drive is provided by a Marvel controller, which disables IDE channel 1 if a SATA drive is connected. You can use a SATA drive on the NFII Ultra, but support is fairly basic.




To make the LanParty image complete, DFI has included a LanParty decal, thermal compound, a pack of jumper caps, and a LanParty ID badge for the front of your case!!

Index DFI NFII Ultra LanParty: Board Layout
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 1, 2003 - link


    This article is useless because it doesn't help anyone that is looking for a high-end board.

    1.Readers want to see how it compares in games! Even though it is stated that different video cards are used, these numbers do not help anyone.

    2.Readers want to see how it compares against other top of the line boards! (why not compare it against a P3, it would be just as usefull!)

    3."Performance tests for the DFI NFII Ultra LanParty were run with the ATI 9800 PRO 128MB video card with AGP Aperture set to 32MB"
    AGP Aperture set to 32MB??? Most people would set this to 128MB! Is there a compatibility problem that should of been stated?


    This article should either be fixed or removed from AnandTech's website as it is damaging to their reputation.

    If nothing is done about this article then it shows how much AnandTech listens to it's readers.

    -no insult intended towards anyone-
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 1, 2003 - link

    This article is a bit low on quality. Visiting the forums I know there are tons of qualified guys/gals that would love, including myself, to write/work at anand. I can't believe that this new guy was the best thing they found. I agree with other comments posted. I also hate with a passion the new benchmark result that are used in some of the article, some were flash... I restrict what runs on my browser because I hate to see a woman f****** a cow when I browse. What happened to the plain jpeg/gif of the past? Would much prefer that since otherwise no point of reading the article
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 1, 2003 - link

    just wanted to respond to number 18, who quoted one of my comments.

    Actually man, I have been a NVIDIA fan and own several NVIDIA products. However as with most of us gamers you have to go where the speed, performance and quality is. I do own a 9700 pro and currently use it for my main gaming, but then again why not? does NVIDIA produce anything that compares?

    NVIDIA has had their last 2 product lines fail, along with there cheats and shortcuts to produce good numbers. I seem to remember another company that did those things, can we say 3DFX? Who baught them???? NVIDIA.

    my point was not that i am biased, but that ATI is currently the top of the line for speed, quality and performance, besides the fact it supports the new directx9.

    which is better to do tests on after all, outdated and slow technology, or up to date top of the line technology?
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    Jeez, why would anyone even bother writing articles for such ungrateful SOBs
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    I may have missed it, but how much is this thing gonna cost?
  • justly - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    There is an explanation about the scores, at the bottom of the preformance test configuration page you can read this

    "Many benchmarks show widely different results with different video hardware, so we have indicated benchmarks run with the ATI Radeon 9800 PRO with an asterisk. Benchmarks without an asterisk were run with the nVidia Ti4600."

    Iam glad to see the move to the ATi 9800 Pro, this eliminates any video bottleneck and allowes for 8X AGP compatibility testing.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    This article really needs fixin!

    First major complaint is the use of old graphics cards. Compare apples to apples. Not apples to oranges to peaches.

    Second, the Asus A78NX was not tested either. This IS the gold standard with AMD enthusiasts. How can we make a good comparison?

    Third, where are the game tests and 3D Mark scores?
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    In response to #6(Wesley):

    I'm not saying your numbers are wrong, I'm saying your description seems wrong. As #21 points out, that description makes absolutely no sense, and as far as I've read, it's wrong. RAID 1.5 is a RAID 1 mirror with "optimized" reads; nothing more. Check Tom's Hardware, I believe they have a good article on this.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    Umm....Striping and mirroring with 2 drives only?

    OK...Let's look at this the way he explained it:

    Take 2, 80 GB drives...

    Half of each contains is striped, the other half used to mirror the stripe.

    In what way is this useful? If 1 drive fails, you've lost the stripe AND the useless mirror...

    Please explain to me why this is a good thing, Anandtech....

    -Phil Green
    LM Information Systems
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    ok i wont comment the different video cards used, im sure you realise this isn't right... especially for the games benches.
    hopefully you'll make up, testing the other boards with this raddy too... also all tests that were done on just this board shall be done to the rest of the boards in time... when you fix all these things i hope you'll put up some notice on the main page.

    i got a major complaint however... the idea to use flash for displaying the graphs isn't good at all. the newest flash plugins for mozilla are incredibly slow, and almost make my pc freeze as i open multiple tabs with your articles(with at least 2 flash adds on each page) so i prefer to disable my flash plugin. i know i dont represent the majority of your readers here, so i'm not important... but yet i think you should consider simple gifs for your graphs.

    now another thing... why does the forum open in such a weird window? i mean, no addressbar and toolbar, etc. thats kinda annoying.

    now a question about the test results... i find some specview results quite weird. in a couple if tests the dfi scores quite less than the rest, and then there's that test where dfi scores 5 times more than the rest.... i'd like to read your comment on these tests, hopefully you have some explanation.

    bye folks, and forgive my bitching :) inspite it, i do like your site and thank you for the articles. you're doing a great job

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now