GPU Performance

As I mentioned on the last page, moving from Snapdragon 410 to Snapdragon 617 doesn't really lead to a significant improvement in real-world CPU performance. What does improve is GPU performance, which is something that has always been a bit of a problem on low-end and mid-range smartphones. The 2015 Moto G used Qualcomm's Snapdragon 410 SoC. Snapdragon 410 uses Qualcomm's Adreno 306 GPU, which put the 2015 Moto G in a bit of an odd position because that same SoC was used in the significantly cheaper Moto E. Snapdragon 617 uses Adreno 405, which we've demonstrated as providing significantly faster performance than Adreno 306 in past reviews of other devices that use it. It's worth testing a device to ensure everything is working correctly even if you already have results for another device with the same SoC, and so I've run our 2016 GPU benchmarks on the Moto G4.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Overall

The 2015 Moto G doesn't support OpenGL ES 3.1, and so there's no way to run 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Unlimited which uses ES 3.1 on Android and Metal on iOS. Snapdragon 617 uses the same Adreno 405 GPU as Snapdragon 615, and you can see in the results that the performance is right in line with the Huawei Honor 5X which uses Snapdragon 615. For a mid-range phone this is generally good performance, but once again the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 sits far ahead of the rest of the mid-range smartphones, including the Moto G4.

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal Onscreen Test

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal Offscreen Test

The situation in BaseMark ES 3.1 is the same as 3DMark, with the G4 Plus achieving roughly the same performance as the Huawei Honor 5X. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 with its Adreno 510 GPU ends up being a little over 75% faster, which is a huge improvement even if both devices technically don't get close to a playable frame rate in this very heavy test.

GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase (On screen)

GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase (Off screen 1080p)

In GFXBench Car Chase it's the story is the same. The Moto G4 Plus is in line with other Adreno 405 devices, but the question is really whether or not that's good enough for a device launching this late into 2016.

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

We've generally moved to Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal for our reviews, but in cases like this where a device's predecessor doesn't support OpenGL ES 3.1 it's helpful to bring back Manhattan ES 3.0 to do a direct performance comparison. As expected, the Moto G4 is much faster than the 2015 Moto G, with on screen performance being about 85% faster despite the move from 720p to 1080p. and off screen performance being over four times faster.

It's clear that the Moto G4 provides much better GPU performance that the 2015 Moto G. However, much like the CPU benchmarks, I keep looking at the charts and seeing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 sitting well above the Moto G4. Adreno 405 is much better than Adreno 306, but Adreno 510 is two times faster than Adreno 405. I feel like the Moto G4 is simply launching too late for this kind of performance to be competitive, as it's tied with the Honor 5X which was launched at $200 nearly a year ago. While I don't mean to take away from the fact that the Moto G4 does provide faster GPU performance than its predecessor, I think there are devices right around the corner that are going to make a mid-range smartphone with Snapdragon 617 look decidedly last generation.

NAND Performance

NAND performance is still an area of concern on mid-range smartphones, but the situation has gotten better in recent times. The 2015 Moto E was an example of a device with very poor NAND performance, but the 2015 Moto G was significantly faster across the board. Motorola is still using eMMC memory, but there's definitely room for improvement over the 2015 Moto G even when sticking with an eMMC storage solution. To evaluate the Moto G4's storage performance I've run AndroBench 4.0 on both the 16GB Moto G4 and the 64GB Moto G4 Plus.

AndroBench 4.0 - Random Read

AndroBench 4.0 - Random Write

AndroBench 4.0 - Sequential Write

Androbench 4.0 - Squential Read

Among mid-range devices, the 64GB Moto G4 Plus performs very well. Random write results are ahead of all other devices on the chart except the Huawei P9, which isn't really a mid-range device and is just there for SoC comparisons. In the sequential write test the Moto G4 leads, which is due in part to the larger capacity allowing greater write parallelism. Sequential read performance is very good as well, although obviously not competitive with UFS 2.0 storage solutions like the one used in the OnePlus 3.

System Performance Display Analysis
POST A COMMENT

94 Comments

View All Comments

  • thunderwave_2 - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    Could you please review the Huawei P9 and P9 Lite? Reply
  • Rajagopal - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    Very bad product. Amazon is selling second hand Moto G4 plus. I purchased a phone recently which I'd not working properly. Neither Motorola responds nor Amazon responds. Public are cheated by the two companies. Reply
  • A5 - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    Don't buy a used phone and expect support? Reply
  • smilingcrow - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    If bought from Amazon Warehouse do expect to get support. Reply
  • jjj - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    Isn't this the first time ever you guys use Profile GPU Rendering? Assuming that's what it is not some app that serves a similar purpose. Anyway, it's great that you do use it but maybe you should have explained the app a bit and show results for some other devices too as most readers are unlikely to be familiar with it. Reply
  • Juan C - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    I saw many charts with the p9 as a reference, are you planning a p9 review? Reply
  • mrdude - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    I bought this phone and have been using it for about two weeks now.

    It replaced my LG G4, and I vow to never buy another LG phone again. The battery died suddenly, and my mother who owns the same phone experienced the same issue within the same week. The move to Android 6.0 has been problematic with inconsistent performance and worse battery life. Soon after the battery died, the charging port went kaput. I didn't have a great experience with my G3 before that, but I gave LG another chance. Never again :)

    I'm on T-Mobile and wanted full GSM coverage at a price that wasn't over $300. I wound up buying the Moto G4 Plus model with 2GB RAM and 16GB storage on Amazon. A few thoughts:

    - I haven't experienced the UI inconsistency. I have noticed that early reviews shared the same feelings, but I'm guessing that may have been fixed promptly after launch as my phone has been as smooth as the LG G4 before it.
    - The most intensive task I'll do is web browsing, and it's perfectly fine for that task. If you're using your phone for gaming, you may want to look elsewhere
    - 2GB RAM isn't enough. I don't have many apps loaded, but the system seems to take nearly 1GB at idle. Add on a few apps and a web browser, and you'll seeing the slight slowdown as you're hitting NAND. 4GB would've been nice
    - 16GB + SD card slot is enough for me. 16GB alone would not have been.
    - The camera is great in the Plus model.
    - The fingerprint sensor not serving a dual purpose as a home button hasn't bothered me at all. This is the first phone I've personally owned with a fingerprint sensor, so that may be why. One issue I have had is that the sensor won't pick up my fingerprint from sleep all the time, requiring to hit the power button and then putting my finger on the sensor.
    - I've never in my life felt buttons that are somehow both stiff and mushy at the same time, but that's the best way to describe the power and volume rocker on the Moto G4 Plus. I've gotten over it now, but it's certainly doesn't scream 'quality'.
    - Outside of the buttons, the build quality is great. Plastic, sure, but it's typical Moto in this regard.

    Thus far, I'm happy. Provided Moto doesn't fail me on Android updates (and it's unlikely that they will given this is essentially stock Android + Moto gestures), I think I'll remain happy.
    Reply
  • nico_mach - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    They've basically admitted that they're not doing upgrades and only quarterly security patches. It's a huge problem, not just for them. Android is increasingly in trouble outside Samsung and arguably Nexus. Google is dropping the ball big time. Reply
  • Rrskda - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    Does the G4/G4 Plus have a gyroscope? I was surprised to see this rarely if ever mentioned in reviews of the G3, in which it was removed. Given the growing interest in VR, I consider this a critical feature. Reply
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, August 15, 2016 - link

    Yes, they added it back in. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now