For the last several generations of desktop processors from Intel, the company has released a higher clocked, special-edition SKU under the KS moniker, which the company positions as their no-holds-barred performance part for that generation. For the 14th Generation Core family, Intel is keeping that tradition alive and well with the announcement of the Core i9-14900KS, which has been eagerly anticipated for months and finally unveiled for launch today. The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a special edition processor with P-Core turbo clock speeds of up to 6.2 GHz, which makes it the fastest desktop processor in the world... at least in terms of advertised frequencies it can achieve.

With their latest KS processor, Intel is looking to further push the envelope on what can be achieved with the company's now venerable Raptor Lake 8+16 silicon. With a further 200 MHz increase in clockspeeds at the top end, Intel is looking to deliver unrivaled desktop performance for enthusiasts. At the same time, as this is the 4th iteration of the "flagship" configuration of the RPL 8+16 die, Intel is looking to squeeze out one more speed boost from the Alder/Raptor family in order to go out on a high note before the entire architecture starts to ride off into the sunset later this year. To get there, Intel will need quite a bit of electricity, and $689 of your savings.

Intel Core i9-14900KS: 6.2 GHz P-Core Turbo for $689

Perhaps the last chip to be launched based on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, which is built using the Intel 7 process, the Intel Core i9-14900KS, on paper, is certainly no slouch. Building on the capabilities of the flagship Core i9-14900K, the Core i9-14900KS rounds out the Raptor Lake-R family with a P-Core turbo of up to 6.2 GHz, which is 200 MHz more than the P-Core turbo on the Core i9-14900K. It also features a slightly higher E-Core turbo 4.5 GHz, a 100 MHz boost there. Otherwise, the base frequencies for the P-Cores and E-Cores.

Clockspeeds aside, the Core i9-14900KS also has the same core/thread count as the Core i9-14900K. This is an 8P+16E die, capable of supporting up to 32 threads. Everything else, including the 36 MB of L3 cache and the Intel UHD 770 integrated graphics, also remains the same.

As has been the case throughout the lifecycle of the KS processors, arguably the key benefit is that prospective buyers won't need to overclock their processor to achieve these insanely high 6.2 GHz P-core turbo clock speeds; Intel does all of it before it's opened out of the box. This is the best of the best of the silicon that Intel has to offer, at least in terms of clockspeed headroom. As the Core i9-14900K, it sits above the current 14th Gen Core series family stack in terms of clock speeds, but it also replaces it as the fastest out-of-the-box x86 processor ever launched in retail.

These blistering clockspeeds do come at a cost in terms of power, however. Intel has given the Core i9-14900KS a base TDP rating of 150 W, up 25 W compared to the Core i9-14900K. Meanwhile the out-of-the-box PL1/PL2 turbo power limit is 253 Watts, and like the previous i9-13900KS, Intel is once again offering a further "extreme" power profile, which raises those limits to 320 Watts. And even then, enthusiast motherboards can and will violate any and all power limits in the name of keeping clockspeeds high and getting the highest performance possible out of the chip, so the published 253W/320W figures are largely academic.

Intel 14/13th Gen Core, Raptor Lake-S/R (K/KS/KF Series) Processors
AnandTech Cores
P+E/T
P-Core
Base
P-Core
Turbo
E-Core
Base
E-Core
Turbo
L3 Cache
(MB)
iGPU Base
W
Turbo
W
Retail Price
($)
i9-14900KS 8+16/32 3200 6200 2400 4500 36 770 150 253 $689
i9-14900K 8+16/32 3200 6000 2400 4400 36 770 125 253 $599
i9-14900KF 8+16/32 3200 6000 2400 4400 36 - 125 253 $574
i9-13900KS 8+16/32 3200 6000 2400 4300 36 770 150 253/320 $640
i9-13900K 8+16/32 3000 5800 2200 4300 36 770 125 253 $537
 
i7-14700K 8+12/28 3400 5600 2500 4300 33 770 125 253 $419
i7-14700KF 8+12/28 3400 5600 2500 4300 33 - 125 253 $394
i7-13700K 8+8/24 3400 5400 2500 4200 30 770 125 253 $365
 
i5-14600K 6+8/20 3500 5300 2600 4000 24 770 125 181 $329
i5-14600KF 6+8/20 3500 5300 2600 4000 24 - 125 181 $304
i5-13600K 6+8/20 3500 5300 2600 3900 24 770 125 181 $285

Case in point: from our review of the first 6.0 GHz processor from Intel, the Core i9-13900KS, we saw a peak power value of around 359 W in our testing. In contrast, when testing the Core i9-14900K with the same power test, we saw a peak power of 375 W, which greatly surpasses the 253 W PL2 limit.

One element to consider is motherboard vendors and their implementations of MCE, which typically push far more power to the chip than Intel puts down in their official specifications to keep their boards ahead of the competition. Fundamentally, the Core i9-14900KS is a 'special binned' version of the regular Core i9-14900K, which means Intel is binning or testing multiple batches of chips that are capable of hitting the 6.2 GHz P-Core turbo clock speeds without running into critical errors. Binning itself is a sort of quality control process to weed out the weaker chips from the more capable silicon, as when chips are fabricated, they aren't all equal to each other in terms of capability.

Perhaps the most important thing to consider with the KS processors, including the latest Core i9-14900KS, is cooling. To get optimal performance, users will need to adopt best-in-class, high-end cooling, such as custom water cooling loops or even Intel's (discontinued) cryogenic adapted coolers. Interestingly, since Intel abandoned the development of their Cryo cooling, EKWB picked up the slack and offers their EK-Quantum Delta TEC D-RGB solution, which should certainly prove better for taming the Core i9-14900KS than a conventional AIO CPU cooler. Using more aggressive cooling methods should prove effective in allowing users to hit the advertised 6.2 GHz core clock speeds for a sustained period of time. It's not easy to keep a processor cool while pulling 375 W, let alone keep it cooled for a prolonged period, so users must consider that.

All of this, in turn, is why the Intel Core i9-14900KS 6.2 GHz P-Core turbo state relies on Intel's Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB) feature; that highest clockspeed doesn't even become available unless there's sufficient thermal headroom for it. Otherwise, users who can't adequately cool the chip for the highest clock speeds are likely to be limited to the true Turbo Boost Max 3.0 frequency of 5.9 GHz, which is just 100MHz higher than the 5.8 GHz limit on the Core i9-14900K and Core i9-14900KF processors.

As Intel hasn't sampled us with the Core i9-14900KS for launch, the company has instead provided some expected performance figures from their own in-house testing. Comparing the latest Core i9-14900KS to the previous KS SKU, the Core i9-13900KS, in gaming performance, Intel has posted modest gains in certain titles, with a 3% gain in performance in Starfield, up to a 15% performance gain in Metro Exodus. Interestingly, Intel's slide deck doesn't compare performance to the current Core i9-14900K, which isn't unexpected. Still, it would have been helpful to see how the extra 200 MHz on the P-Core turbo frequency has an effect on actual real-world performance. It's also worth noting that Intel is using its Application Optimization software to boost these gains, which, in the case of Metro Exodus, actually increases frame rate performance by around 11%, as Intel themselves claim.

In computing performance, Intel compares the Core i9-14900KS directly to AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X and posts performance gains in various workloads and applications. In the UL Procyon Office benchmark, Intel posts gains of 5% over the Ryzen 9 7950X, whereas in CineBench 2024's single-threaded test is claiming gains of 16%, which, given the 6.2 GHz core clock speed, single-threaded workloads are likely to see the biggest benefit to performance.

Looking at motherboard support, the Intel Core i9-14900KS is compatible with both the Z690 and Z790 chipsets, with both DDR5 and DDR4 memory types also being supported. As was the case with the previous-generation i9-13900KS, this is primarily driven by power requirements – KS chips require a lot of power, and non-enthusiast boards are rarely equipped to deliver it, as they're expected to be paired with more mid-range chips. With the increased power requirements of the KS chips, the Z690 and Z790 series motherboards are also a better fit with bigger and more capable power deliveries and more optimal power delivery heatsinks for processors of this calibre.

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is available today at PC component retailers, with Intel setting an MSRP of $689. Interestingly, this is $10 lower than the previous Core i9-13900KS processor at launch, so Intel's flagship desktop CPU is very slowly coming down in price over time. Unfortunately, as with previous iterations of the KS processors, Intel hasn't clarified how many Core i9-14900KS processors will be available to buy or how many they intend to manufacture. However, the Core i9-13900KS is still available to purchase at Amazon even a year later for $640.

Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Thursday, March 14, 2024 - link

    That's a pretty hefty markup to get a CPU that's only going to hold the "world's fastest desktop processor*" title for a short duration while gobbling up lots more power to give the moron that buys it barely detectable increases in performance. BUT what it also does is serves as a talking point to further place the company logo and the rest of the product stack under the scrutiny of potentially more prudent buyers so they still purchase an Intel something-or-other so it at least is farming money from the dwindling flock of people that buy desktop parts.
  • shabby - Thursday, March 14, 2024 - link

    But its not the worlds fastest, just the worlds highest clocked, still looses to a 7800x3d.
  • PeachNCream - Friday, March 15, 2024 - link

    Anticipating brand-based commentary, I already added a disclaimer * to account for accidentally inspiring the inevitable product value discussion these sorts of things tend to create. Although I personally haven't given brand loyalty any thought in a long time, I do acknowledge PC components and companies in particular seem to have an us-versus-them entrenchment stronger than would be the case in other sectors of the economy.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, March 18, 2024 - link

    That's a lot of words to signify nothing. Doesnt change the fact that the 14900ks ISNT the fastest. It loses to the 7800x3d. So the idea that it is holding the "worlds fastest desktop processor" is factually incorrect.
  • eloyard - Friday, March 15, 2024 - link

    Louder, hotter, more expensive.

    Can't say i'm impressed, Intel.

    On the other hand, it's not like i had any other expectations to begin with.
  • goatfajitas - Friday, March 15, 2024 - link

    yup, but if I lived in a much colder climate I would be glad to have one of these. Maybe that is what Intel is thinking. Every office I have ever worked in has a good percentage of people with a small space heater under thier desk to keep warm. This solves that problem entirely. =)
  • PeachNCream - Friday, March 15, 2024 - link

    There are fewer colder climates now than ever. It was irrationally warm the past four winters here to the point where a typical desktop PC would impose a significantly negative energy consumption impact from both its own demand and as a consequence of its waste heat. Three decades ago this area made a mountain of blankets a necessity, but it's quite different now. In fact, one of the things that drove me away from desktop computers was the waste heat. First dabbling in cooler running CPUs like VIA's C3 and C7 series and then fully away from them to use conventional laptops and then early, passively cooled Atom netbooks for everyday computing. Haven't really looked back much since and it has helped quite a bit. I can't imagine having to cool a room where a PC and its peripherals are legitimately consuming 400-800W. That would be miserable even with a modern heat pump and good insulation.
  • ballsystemlord - Friday, March 15, 2024 - link

    Erm, maybe you don't recall, but we've had a winter within the past 10 years where record lows were set. It froze really badly in south Florida, USA for several nights. Likewise, in 1990 there was a similarly bad winter in south Florida, USA.
    There was also a really bad free in Texas not too many years ago.

    Your concerns may be valid for your area, but they are not universally valid.
  • tamalero - Saturday, March 16, 2024 - link

    To be honest.. the ones in Texas was irrelevant. Since almost noone had power. Therefore even if you wanted to use the 14900ks as a furnace.. you would be unable to.
  • ballsystemlord - Saturday, March 16, 2024 - link

    I was more commenting on the existence of cold winters in recent times, not so much that we'd be able to use the 14900KS as a furnace.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now