Testing Results, Maximum Fan Speed

Our maximum speed testing is performed with both the fans and the pump of the kit powered via a 12V DC source. This input voltage should have the pump and fans matching the speed ratings of the manufacturer. According to the company’s specifications, the Squama fans included with the Eskimo Junior 36 should have a rotational speed of 2000 RPM. Our tachometer indicated that the fans were rotating at an average speed of 1960 RPM, very close to their rated specifications.

Average Thermal Resistance

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Max Fan Speed)

The Geometric Future Eskimo Junior 36 demonstrates commendable performance across various loads, with an average thermal resistance of 0.0734 °C/W at its maximum fan speed of 1960 RPM. This figure, while slightly higher than many other 360 mm coolers, is noteworthy considering the relatively low maximum speed of the supplied fans. The cooler appears to be performing very well when the loads are high but loses ground when the load is very low.

Fan Speed (12 Volts)

The Eskimo Junior 36 maintains a sound pressure level (SPL) of 40.9 dB(A) at full fan speed, one of the lowest figures amongst the 360 mm AIO coolers in our database. That is not a quiet figure of course – the cooler will be clearly audible even from a distance – but we consider it tolerable for typical gaming/workstation use. 360 mm coolers typically do not run their fans at maximum speed as they can easily cope with the thermal load of CPUs without having to. It is noteworthy to mention that the pump, rated at 30 dB(A) by the manufacturer, is practically inaudible, meaning that nearly all of the noise is aerodynamic noise generated by the three cooling fans.

Noise level

Testing Results, Low Fan Speed

Using a PWM voltage regulator, we reduced the speed of the fans manually down to half their rated speed. At this setting, the 120 mm Squama fans of the Eskimo Junior 36 rotate at 1000 RPM.

Average Thermal Resistance

Core Temperature, Constant Thermal Load (Low Fan Speed)

The Geometric Future Eskimo Junior 36, when operating at half speed (1000 RPM for the fans), demonstrates fair cooling efficiency with an average thermal resistance of 0.0829 °C/W. Once again, its thermal performance is significantly improved at higher loads, with the cooler falling behind when the loads are low to very low.

Fan Speed (7 Volts)

The acoustic performance of the Geometric Future Eskimo Junior 36 cooler is quite good when its fans are operating at half speed. At 1000 RPM the cooler maintains a relatively low noise level of 35.2 dB(A), making it a quieter cooling solution compared to many other models that are running their fans at higher speeds.

Noise level

Thermal Resistance VS Sound Pressure Level

During our thermal resistance vs. sound pressure level test, we maintain a steady 100W thermal load and assess the overall performance of the coolers by taking multiple temperature and sound pressure level readings within the operating range of the stock cooling fans. The result is a graph that depicts the absolute thermal resistance of the cooler in comparison to the noise generated. For both the sound pressure level and absolute thermal resistance readings, lower figures are better.

The Geometric Future Eskimo Junior 36, while falling slightly behind some similar designs in its category, maintains a competitive stance in the market. It offers good thermal performance that is remarkably linear and shows minimal impact from airflow changes. This performance profile indicates that the Eskimo Junior 36 is a solid choice for those prioritizing scenarios where lower fan speeds are desirable. On the other hand, its thermal performance does not improve significantly at higher airflows, limiting its maximum potential.

Testing Methodology Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

38 Comments

View All Comments

  • DougMcC - Friday, February 9, 2024 - link

    Yep, here's why: "Although the name "Eskimo" was commonly used in Alaska to refer to Inuit and Yupik people of the world, this usage is now considered unacceptable by many or even most Alaska Natives, largely since it is a colonial name imposed by non-Indigenous people."
    Basically, it's a slaver name not the name used by the people themselves.
  • charlesg - Friday, February 9, 2024 - link

    Okay. I'm pretty sure we're talking about a piece of computer hardware?

    To be offended by what someone chose to call a piece of computer hardware is just plain bizarre.
  • Threska - Friday, February 9, 2024 - link

    People in Alaska can just open a window if they need a cooler PC.
  • Slash3 - Sunday, February 11, 2024 - link

    Can confirm.
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, February 10, 2024 - link

    I never knew the term was offensive, but learnt something new, thanks to the OP's comment. The fact that it's not offensive to me doesn't mean it's not offensive to the people whom it refers to, the people on the receiving end of whatever feelings it evokes. After all, the world doesn't revolve around me and my ideas of what are offensive or not.

    Sure, it may be a piece of hardware, but the choice reveals a lot. Even if the word wasn't derogatory, it still comes down to using a name of a people flippantly, from the outside, to market a product.
  • charlesg - Sunday, February 11, 2024 - link

    It's out of control.

    What I'm offended by you being offended?
  • GeoffreyA - Sunday, February 11, 2024 - link

    I agree there's a lot to consider, and I'm not supporting that people should be sensitive to everything that's said. But, on the other hand, English has historically been rife with terms that are derogatory to others.

    I don't understand. Can you explain?
  • TheinsanegamerN - Wednesday, February 14, 2024 - link

    You've contradicted yourself. The implication that English somehow has more derogatory words then other languages is unsupported. If all it takes for you to believe something is "deragatory" is a comment saying it is, then you cant really say you're against people being offended by anything that's said.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Wednesday, February 14, 2024 - link

    Or it's just a word and the naval gazing internet is constantly looking for new words to be triggered by.
  • GeoffreyA - Wednesday, February 14, 2024 - link

    TheinsanegamerN, I agree I could have been tighter in my thinking and phrasing; but what I'm calling for is balance, not for or against. I didn't take the comment as fact, but according to Wikipedia, found that it is viewed negatively by the people in question.

    Again, I do not support people being sensitive to everything said---that leads to censorship. We should be able to speak the truth boldly, no matter whom it upsets: president or clown. On the other hand, we ought to be considerate and not use terms that others, especially innocents, may be hurt by. The one on the receiving end is judge of that. I think it is a matter of discretion. Truth comes first; but freedom of speech has to be combined with respecting human dignity.

    Agreed that English having more derogatory words than others is unsupported.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now